Rational vs. irrational beliefs in a complex world

How do rational and boundedly rational agents interact in a competitive asset market? To answer this question, we build a highly nonlinear asset pricing model where agents hold heterogeneous beliefs. Our model features fully rational forward looking agents versus boundedly rational backward looking agents whose market shares evolve endogenously. This gives rise to chaotic model dynamics which are characterized by complex bubble and crash dynamics, even without any exogenous fluctuations. We show that computational methods can be applied to numerically analyze models combining agents forming rational expectations and agents forming extrapolative expectations, with the possibility of transition between one type of behavior and the other. Not only do we find that boundedly rational agents remain in the market, but document that their effect on price dynamics is even amplified by the behavior of fully rational agents. In their interaction, trend-extrapolators amplify small deviations from fundamentals, while rational agents eventually anticipate market crashes after large bubbles and drive prices back to the fundamental.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
Published
2025-02-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2025.106898
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rational vs. irrational beliefs in a complex world

Gregor Boehl, Cars Hommes
2 citations
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
4.42
article

Rational vs. irrational beliefs in a complex world

Gregor Boehl, Cars Hommes
article en
2 citations

Abstract

How do rational and boundedly rational agents interact in a competitive asset market? To answer this question, we build a highly nonlinear asset pricing model where agents hold heterogeneous beliefs. Our model features fully rational forward looking agents versus boundedly rational backward looking agents whose market shares evolve endogenously. This gives rise to chaotic model dynamics which are characterized by complex bubble and crash dynamics, even without any exogenous fluctuations. We show that computational methods can be applied to numerically analyze models combining agents forming rational expectations and agents forming extrapolative expectations, with the possibility of transition between one type of behavior and the other. Not only do we find that boundedly rational agents remain in the market, but document that their effect on price dynamics is even amplified by the behavior of fully rational agents. In their interaction, trend-extrapolators amplify small deviations from fundamentals, while rational agents eventually anticipate market crashes after large bubbles and drive prices back to the fundamental.

Journal of Economic Behavior & OrganizationVol. 232
University of Bonn (DE), Tinbergen Institute (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
4.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Rational vs. irrational beliefs in a complex world — Gregor Boehl, Cars Hommes · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS