The female finance penalty: Why are women less successful in academic finance than related fields?

We study the publication patterns of male and female finance scholars, contrasting them with their counterparts in the related fields of accounting, economics and general management by analysing a large sample of more than 400,000 journal outputs spanning over two decades. We show that, in particularly stark contrast to accounting and management publications, women are vastly under-represented as authors of finance ones. Further, our results demonstrate that work produced by female finance academics is published in lower-rated journals and garners fewer citations, a phenomenon we refer to as the ‘female finance penalty’. We find that the topics on which women in academic finance work and the methodological approaches they use are highly associated with this penalty. In particular, we show that female finance authors are more likely to engage in interdisciplinary and qualitative work, and to investigate topics that are linked with lower research success. Moreover, when it comes to journal placement, we find that female-authored work in finance is ‘penalised’ more for its interdisciplinarity than that authored by men. Finally, we show that female finance authors are less likely to be affiliated to US-based or highly ranked institutions – factors that typically increase both publication success and future citation – and when they are, there is some evidence that their citation rates are less likely to benefit from these affiliations than those of their male colleagues. • We study the publication patterns of male and female finance scholars compared with related fields • Women are vastly under-represented as authors of finance papers • Work by female finance academics is published in lower-rated journals and yields fewer citations • Female finance authors are more likely to engage in interdisciplinary and qualitative work • Female finance authors are less likely to be affiliated to US-based or highly ranked institutions

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Policy
Published
2025-02-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2025.105207
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Innovations in Educational Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
44.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The female finance penalty: Why are women less successful in academic finance than related fields?

Lisa Schopohl, Chris Brooks, Ran Tao, Millie Zhu et al.
5 citations
Research Policy
Innovations in Educational Methods
44.63
article

The female finance penalty: Why are women less successful in academic finance than related fields?

Lisa Schopohl, Chris Brooks, Ran Tao, Millie Zhu, James T. Walker
article en
5 citations

Abstract

We study the publication patterns of male and female finance scholars, contrasting them with their counterparts in the related fields of accounting, economics and general management by analysing a large sample of more than 400,000 journal outputs spanning over two decades. We show that, in particularly stark contrast to accounting and management publications, women are vastly under-represented as authors of finance ones. Further, our results demonstrate that work produced by female finance academics is published in lower-rated journals and garners fewer citations, a phenomenon we refer to as the ‘female finance penalty’. We find that the topics on which women in academic finance work and the methodological approaches they use are highly associated with this penalty. In particular, we show that female finance authors are more likely to engage in interdisciplinary and qualitative work, and to investigate topics that are linked with lower research success. Moreover, when it comes to journal placement, we find that female-authored work in finance is ‘penalised’ more for its interdisciplinarity than that authored by men. Finally, we show that female finance authors are less likely to be affiliated to US-based or highly ranked institutions – factors that typically increase both publication success and future citation – and when they are, there is some evidence that their citation rates are less likely to benefit from these affiliations than those of their male colleagues. • We study the publication patterns of male and female finance scholars compared with related fields • Women are vastly under-represented as authors of finance papers • Work by female finance academics is published in lower-rated journals and yields fewer citations • Female finance authors are more likely to engage in interdisciplinary and qualitative work • Female finance authors are less likely to be affiliated to US-based or highly ranked institutions

Research PolicyVol. 54(4)
University of Bristol (GB), University of Reading (GB)
Leverhulme Trust, British Academy
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Innovations in Educational Methods
44.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.