Mean limiting pressure factors determination in contiguous pile walls using RAFELA and nonlinear regression models in spatially random soil

• Random adaptive finite element limit analysis (RAFELA) predicts pressure factors. • MARS and GMDH models developed for CPWs using nonlinear regression techniques. • MARS achieves the highest accuracy with R² of 0.983 for training and 0.969 for testing. • Soil variability, adhesion factor, and uniformity most influence the pressure factor. • User-friendly ML models bridge theory and practice for geotechnical applications. This study employs random adaptive finite element limit analysis (RAFELA) combined with advanced machine learning (ML) techniques to predict the mean limiting pressure factor in contiguous pile walls (CPWs). Two nonlinear regression models, multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) and the group method of data handling (GMDH), are developed to forecast the mean limiting pressure factor. The models were evaluated using several statistical performance parameters, scatter plots, residual error curves, and eight statistical performance metrics to ensure predictive accuracy and reliability. Based on the statistical analysis and comparison, the proposed MARS model is the most accurate model, with R 2 = 0.983 for training and R 2 = 0.969 for the testing phase, followed by GMDH (R 2 = 0.971 for training and R 2 = 0.944 for testing). Comprehensive measures (COM) reveal that the MARS model, with the lowest COM value of 1.006, outperforms the GMDH model (COM = 4.943), demonstrating superior accuracy in predicting the limiting pressure factor ( μ N r a n ). Feature importance analysis reveals that the output μ N r a n is most influenced by soil variability ( C o V c = 0.749), followed by the adhesion factor ( α = 0.735) and soil uniformity ( Θ c = 0.681), whereas the S/D ratio has the lowest impact (0.378). Moreover, the proposed ML models provide user-friendly empirical equations to calculate the mean limiting pressure factor, requiring minimal computational expertise, thus bridging the gap between theoretical stochastic studies and practical field applications. This research enhances geotechnical design efficiency with robust ML solutions, supporting safer and more sustainable excavation practices under complex subsurface conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Results in Engineering
Published
2025-02-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.104436
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mean limiting pressure factors determination in contiguous pile walls using RAFELA and nonlinear regression models in spatially random soil

Warit Wipulanusat, Suraparb Keawsawasvong, Divesh Ranjan Kumar, Sittha Kaorapapong
8 citations
Results in Engineering
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
10.43
article

Mean limiting pressure factors determination in contiguous pile walls using RAFELA and nonlinear regression models in spatially random soil

Warit Wipulanusat, Suraparb Keawsawasvong, Divesh Ranjan Kumar, Sittha Kaorapapong
article en
8 citations

Abstract

• Random adaptive finite element limit analysis (RAFELA) predicts pressure factors. • MARS and GMDH models developed for CPWs using nonlinear regression techniques. • MARS achieves the highest accuracy with R² of 0.983 for training and 0.969 for testing. • Soil variability, adhesion factor, and uniformity most influence the pressure factor. • User-friendly ML models bridge theory and practice for geotechnical applications. This study employs random adaptive finite element limit analysis (RAFELA) combined with advanced machine learning (ML) techniques to predict the mean limiting pressure factor in contiguous pile walls (CPWs). Two nonlinear regression models, multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) and the group method of data handling (GMDH), are developed to forecast the mean limiting pressure factor. The models were evaluated using several statistical performance parameters, scatter plots, residual error curves, and eight statistical performance metrics to ensure predictive accuracy and reliability. Based on the statistical analysis and comparison, the proposed MARS model is the most accurate model, with R 2 = 0.983 for training and R 2 = 0.969 for the testing phase, followed by GMDH (R 2 = 0.971 for training and R 2 = 0.944 for testing). Comprehensive measures (COM) reveal that the MARS model, with the lowest COM value of 1.006, outperforms the GMDH model (COM = 4.943), demonstrating superior accuracy in predicting the limiting pressure factor ( μ N r a n ). Feature importance analysis reveals that the output μ N r a n is most influenced by soil variability ( C o V c = 0.749), followed by the adhesion factor ( α = 0.735) and soil uniformity ( Θ c = 0.681), whereas the S/D ratio has the lowest impact (0.378). Moreover, the proposed ML models provide user-friendly empirical equations to calculate the mean limiting pressure factor, requiring minimal computational expertise, thus bridging the gap between theoretical stochastic studies and practical field applications. This research enhances geotechnical design efficiency with robust ML solutions, supporting safer and more sustainable excavation practices under complex subsurface conditions.

Results in EngineeringVol. 25
Thammasat University (TH)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
10.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.