[A preliminary study on the causes of olfactory dysfunction following aesthetic rhinoplasty].

<b>Objective:</b> This study aims to evaluate the nasal structural and electrophysiological features of patients with postoperative olfactory dysfunction following aesthetic rhinoplasty. <b>Methods:</b> We retrospectively analyzed the clinical features of 30 outpatients (females, aged 33±6 years) from Beijing Anzhen Hospital and China-Japan Friendship Hospital between 2014 and 2023, who complained of olfactory dysfunction following aesthetic rhinoplasty. The control group was 30 healthy females aged 32±9 years. Psychophysical olfactory test (Sniffin' Sticks, SS), olfactory and trigeminal event-related potentials (oERPs and tERPs), and acoustic rhinometry were used for evaluating the olfactory function and nasal structure in patients and healthy controls. SPSS 17.0 software was used to compare the difference in olfactory function and nasal structure between the two groups and to analyze the factors related postoperative olfactory dysfunction. <b>Results:</b> There was a significant difference in the scores on psychophysical olfactory test between the patients and controls (10.78±3.90 <i>vs</i>. 33.66±2.42, <i>t</i>=-23.35, <i>P</i><0.001). ERPs could be evoked in all patients and controls. Patients showed higher amplitudes of N<sub>1</sub> waves in both oERPs and tERPs than controls (<i>P</i><0.05 for all), but no differences in the latencies of N<sub>1</sub> and P<sub>2</sub> waves or in the amplitudes of P<sub>2</sub> waves were observed between the two groups (<i>P</i>>0.05 for all). There was no difference in nasal structure between the two groups (<i>P</i>>0.05). However, after nasal decongestant, mucosal congestion in the cross-sectional area (CSA) from the nostril to 6 cm level was found more significantly in patients than controls (nasal congestion index 40.00% <i>vs</i>. 1.00%, <i>t</i>=2.09, <i>P</i>=0.047). Better olfactory function was associated with increasing nasal volumes, increasing nasal threshold and anterior nasal turbinate plane CSA(<i>P<</i>0.05 for all). <b>Conclusion:</b> The important factor related to olfactory dysfunction following aesthetic rhinoplasty may be attributed to local mucosal congestion, rather than nasal structural alteration or neurophysiologic deficits in the olfactory pathway.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2025-02-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20240324-00168
Primary Topic
Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Type
article
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

[A preliminary study on the causes of olfactory dysfunction following aesthetic rhinoplasty].

J F Liu, Can Hu, Wenhao Hu, J Liu et al.
PubMed
Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
article

[A preliminary study on the causes of olfactory dysfunction following aesthetic rhinoplasty].

J F Liu, Can Hu, Wenhao Hu, J Liu, Xinyi Gao, Linyin Yao, Xiaojun Zhan
article en

Abstract

<b>Objective:</b> This study aims to evaluate the nasal structural and electrophysiological features of patients with postoperative olfactory dysfunction following aesthetic rhinoplasty. <b>Methods:</b> We retrospectively analyzed the clinical features of 30 outpatients (females, aged 33±6 years) from Beijing Anzhen Hospital and China-Japan Friendship Hospital between 2014 and 2023, who complained of olfactory dysfunction following aesthetic rhinoplasty. The control group was 30 healthy females aged 32±9 years. Psychophysical olfactory test (Sniffin' Sticks, SS), olfactory and trigeminal event-related potentials (oERPs and tERPs), and acoustic rhinometry were used for evaluating the olfactory function and nasal structure in patients and healthy controls. SPSS 17.0 software was used to compare the difference in olfactory function and nasal structure between the two groups and to analyze the factors related postoperative olfactory dysfunction. <b>Results:</b> There was a significant difference in the scores on psychophysical olfactory test between the patients and controls (10.78±3.90 <i>vs</i>. 33.66±2.42, <i>t</i>=-23.35, <i>P</i><0.001). ERPs could be evoked in all patients and controls. Patients showed higher amplitudes of N<sub>1</sub> waves in both oERPs and tERPs than controls (<i>P</i><0.05 for all), but no differences in the latencies of N<sub>1</sub> and P<sub>2</sub> waves or in the amplitudes of P<sub>2</sub> waves were observed between the two groups (<i>P</i>>0.05 for all). There was no difference in nasal structure between the two groups (<i>P</i>>0.05). However, after nasal decongestant, mucosal congestion in the cross-sectional area (CSA) from the nostril to 6 cm level was found more significantly in patients than controls (nasal congestion index 40.00% <i>vs</i>. 1.00%, <i>t</i>=2.09, <i>P</i>=0.047). Better olfactory function was associated with increasing nasal volumes, increasing nasal threshold and anterior nasal turbinate plane CSA(<i>P<</i>0.05 for all). <b>Conclusion:</b> The important factor related to olfactory dysfunction following aesthetic rhinoplasty may be attributed to local mucosal congestion, rather than nasal structural alteration or neurophysiologic deficits in the olfactory pathway.

PubMedVol. 60(2)
Capital Medical University (CN), Beijing Anzhen Hospital (CN)
Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.