Testing times: The affective impact of tests in Bangladeshi schools

Inadequate attention has been given to the nature and effects of testing on schooling in Bangladesh in research literature to date. In particular, there has been insufficient regard for the emotional or ‘affective’ impact of testing practices on students, educators and parents. We illustrate how the provision of a quality education presents as a particular challenge in a developing country such as Bangladesh, and how specific markers of achievement – notably test results, and particularly those associated with students’ attainment at the end of secondary schooling (Secondary School Certificate) – dictate so much of the lives of all stakeholders. Drawing upon literature and theorising associated with critical data studies, particularly in relation to the affective effects of testing, and interviews with senior Ministry of Education officials, headteachers, subject-teacher specialists, classroom teachers, students and parents in regional and metropolitan school settings in Bangladesh, schooling is revealed as a deeply affective enterprise in which over emphasis upon testing exacerbates and hides the failure of the decision-makers in education to pursue necessary policies and priorities. This includes adequate public investments, the provision of sufficient motivated and skilled teachers, and effective teaching-learning in the classroom – the lack of which create the conditions for private coaching and memorization-based testing. The research reveals a schooling system and broader culture which endorses, or at least accepts, private tutoring which has built up around high-stakes testing, but also how such tutoring is only available to those students and families able to afford such services. The result is a schooling system which is complicit in cultivating a broader culture in which testing and tutoring distract from the needs of education provision more broadly in Bangladesh society, leading to discriminatory and disenfranchising practices, even as the limitations of test-centred practices are critiqued, and efforts are made by educators to reduce reliance upon external tutoring as a necessary complement to schooling. • The nature and effect of testing on schooling provision and equity in Bangladesh. • Critical data studies as informative for critiquing test-centric practices. • A test-centric culture as complicit in disenfranchising many students. • Access to coaching and tutoring as discriminatory. • Critique of test-centric practices even as testing and tutoring dominate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Educational Development
Published
2025-02-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103239
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global Educational Reforms and Inequalities
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.59

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Testing times: The affective impact of tests in Bangladeshi schools

Louise Gwenneth Phillips, M. Obaidul Hamid, Vicente Reyes, Ian Hardy
1 citations
International Journal of Educational Development
Global Educational Reforms and Inequalities
5.59
article

Testing times: The affective impact of tests in Bangladeshi schools

Louise Gwenneth Phillips, M. Obaidul Hamid, Vicente Reyes, Ian Hardy
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Inadequate attention has been given to the nature and effects of testing on schooling in Bangladesh in research literature to date. In particular, there has been insufficient regard for the emotional or ‘affective’ impact of testing practices on students, educators and parents. We illustrate how the provision of a quality education presents as a particular challenge in a developing country such as Bangladesh, and how specific markers of achievement – notably test results, and particularly those associated with students’ attainment at the end of secondary schooling (Secondary School Certificate) – dictate so much of the lives of all stakeholders. Drawing upon literature and theorising associated with critical data studies, particularly in relation to the affective effects of testing, and interviews with senior Ministry of Education officials, headteachers, subject-teacher specialists, classroom teachers, students and parents in regional and metropolitan school settings in Bangladesh, schooling is revealed as a deeply affective enterprise in which over emphasis upon testing exacerbates and hides the failure of the decision-makers in education to pursue necessary policies and priorities. This includes adequate public investments, the provision of sufficient motivated and skilled teachers, and effective teaching-learning in the classroom – the lack of which create the conditions for private coaching and memorization-based testing. The research reveals a schooling system and broader culture which endorses, or at least accepts, private tutoring which has built up around high-stakes testing, but also how such tutoring is only available to those students and families able to afford such services. The result is a schooling system which is complicit in cultivating a broader culture in which testing and tutoring distract from the needs of education provision more broadly in Bangladesh society, leading to discriminatory and disenfranchising practices, even as the limitations of test-centred practices are critiqued, and efforts are made by educators to reduce reliance upon external tutoring as a necessary complement to schooling. • The nature and effect of testing on schooling provision and equity in Bangladesh. • Critical data studies as informative for critiquing test-centric practices. • A test-centric culture as complicit in disenfranchising many students. • Access to coaching and tutoring as discriminatory. • Critique of test-centric practices even as testing and tutoring dominate.

International Journal of Educational DevelopmentVol. 114
The University of Queensland (AU), University of Bristol (GB)
Australian Research Council
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Global Educational Reforms and Inequalities
5.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.