State Regulation of Women's Employment and Occupational Segregation in the Russian Labour Sphere – 100 Years of History (Part 3. 1992-2024)

This paper analyzes changes in the regulation of women’s employment conditions and regimes, as well as the dynamics of gender-based industrial segregation, based on a comprehensive review of policy documents and legislative acts. The first part of the article focuses on the early Soviet period and the Great Patriotic War (1917–1945), when the principle of equality between women and men emphasized the liberation of women from domestic duties through their full participation in the workforce. This was accompanied by efforts to integrate women into industries where their labor had previously been underutilized or excluded, alongside measures to restrict women’s employment in hazardous conditions. During this period, gender-based industrial segregation decreased significantly. The second part examines the post-war Soviet era (1945–1991). A declining birth rate, attributed to the “double burden” of work and family responsibilities borne by women, prompted the state to rethink its approach to gender equality in the workplace. Initially, the focus on maximizing women’s employment was supplemented by efforts to place women in relatively light yet well-paid jobs. Later, policies aimed to create “favorable conditions for women to balance professional and family responsibilities” and eventually called for women to “return to the family.” This period saw the entrenchment of stereotypes depicting women as workers encumbered by family duties, an increase in workplace discrimination, and the emergence of an upward trend in gender-based industrial segregation. This was characterized by the concentration of women in non-manufacturing sectors and men in material production. The third part (1992–2024) explores the post-Soviet history of state regulation of women’s employment. This era began with the legislative establishment of equality not only in rights but also in opportunities for men and women, as well as equal parental responsibilities in child-rearing. However, the focus gradually shifted back toward protectionist policies for women, including the revival of practices regulating the professional composition of employed women. According to Rosstat data, despite the adoption of gender-neutral labor legislation, modern Russian society—steeped in traditional gender roles and emphasizing women’s role as mothers—has seen an increase in the polarization of gender distributions across traditionally “male” and “female” industries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Issues of Economic Theory
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52342/2587-7666vte_2025_1_147_166
Primary Topic
Regional Socio-Economic Development Trends
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

State Regulation of Women's Employment and Occupational Segregation in the Russian Labour Sphere – 100 Years of History (Part 3. 1992-2024)

Marina Baskakova
Issues of Economic Theory
Regional Socio-Economic Development Trends
article

State Regulation of Women's Employment and Occupational Segregation in the Russian Labour Sphere – 100 Years of History (Part 3. 1992-2024)

Marina Baskakova
article en

Abstract

This paper analyzes changes in the regulation of women’s employment conditions and regimes, as well as the dynamics of gender-based industrial segregation, based on a comprehensive review of policy documents and legislative acts. The first part of the article focuses on the early Soviet period and the Great Patriotic War (1917–1945), when the principle of equality between women and men emphasized the liberation of women from domestic duties through their full participation in the workforce. This was accompanied by efforts to integrate women into industries where their labor had previously been underutilized or excluded, alongside measures to restrict women’s employment in hazardous conditions. During this period, gender-based industrial segregation decreased significantly. The second part examines the post-war Soviet era (1945–1991). A declining birth rate, attributed to the “double burden” of work and family responsibilities borne by women, prompted the state to rethink its approach to gender equality in the workplace. Initially, the focus on maximizing women’s employment was supplemented by efforts to place women in relatively light yet well-paid jobs. Later, policies aimed to create “favorable conditions for women to balance professional and family responsibilities” and eventually called for women to “return to the family.” This period saw the entrenchment of stereotypes depicting women as workers encumbered by family duties, an increase in workplace discrimination, and the emergence of an upward trend in gender-based industrial segregation. This was characterized by the concentration of women in non-manufacturing sectors and men in material production. The third part (1992–2024) explores the post-Soviet history of state regulation of women’s employment. This era began with the legislative establishment of equality not only in rights but also in opportunities for men and women, as well as equal parental responsibilities in child-rearing. However, the focus gradually shifted back toward protectionist policies for women, including the revival of practices regulating the professional composition of employed women. According to Rosstat data, despite the adoption of gender-neutral labor legislation, modern Russian society—steeped in traditional gender roles and emphasizing women’s role as mothers—has seen an increase in the polarization of gender distributions across traditionally “male” and “female” industries.

Issues of Economic TheoryVol. 26(1)
The Institute of Europe of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Regional Socio-Economic Development Trends
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.