Real-World Analysis of Adherence to Abemaciclib and Endocrine Therapy in Women with HR+/HER2− Breast Cancer

<b>Background:</b> Adherence to oral anticancer therapies among breast cancer patients is an often-overlooked issue. A lack of patient compliance can be caused by several factors, and may hinder the efficacy of prescribed medication, leading to a shorter than expected survival. In this context, few data about adherence to CDK4/6 inhibitors in real-world practice are available. We report here the results of a retrospective analysis of adherence to abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy in a cohort of women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), epidermal growth factor 2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer. <b>Methods:</b> Abemaciclib adherence was computed as the ratio between the total number of cycles/months that medication was supplied and the months between the first and the last prescription. The proportion of Days Covered (PDC) ranged from 0 to 1. A score of 0.8 (i.e., 80% adherence rate) was the cutoff used to classify the patients as adherent (0.8 ≤ PDC ≤ 1) or non-adherent (0 ≤ PDC < 0.8). The received dose intensity was also calculated. <b>Results:</b> The abemaciclib pharmacy claims of 100 women with HR+/HER2- breast cancer were retrieved. Most patients (91%) were treated in the advanced setting. Abemaciclib was more frequently taken with an aromatase inhibitor (63%) than with fulvestrant (27%). In this population, the adherence rate was high (92.25% + 1.939 SD). The proportion of non-adherent patients taking abemaciclib with PDC <0.8 was 12%. There was a significative correlation between the occurrence of side effects and the use of <5 drugs for non-oncological illnesses, probably reflecting concomitant non-oncological diseases. <b>Conclusions:</b> Adherence to abemaciclib-based therapy is high in a real-life setting, pending the adequate and proactive management of patients. The careful evaluation of patients and detailed information about expected adverse events are essential to ensure adherence to this antineoplastic agent.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedicines
Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13030546
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.56
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-World Analysis of Adherence to Abemaciclib and Endocrine Therapy in Women with HR+/HER2− Breast Cancer

Maria Rosaria Valerio, Federica Martorana, Giuliana Pavone, Giuseppa Scandurra et al.
3 citations
Biomedicines
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
4.56
article

Real-World Analysis of Adherence to Abemaciclib and Endocrine Therapy in Women with HR+/HER2− Breast Cancer

Maria Rosaria Valerio, Federica Martorana, Giuliana Pavone, Giuseppa Scandurra, Lucia Motta, Daniela Sambataro, Gianmarco Motta, Maria Vita Sanò, Vittorio Gebbia
article en
3 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Adherence to oral anticancer therapies among breast cancer patients is an often-overlooked issue. A lack of patient compliance can be caused by several factors, and may hinder the efficacy of prescribed medication, leading to a shorter than expected survival. In this context, few data about adherence to CDK4/6 inhibitors in real-world practice are available. We report here the results of a retrospective analysis of adherence to abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy in a cohort of women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), epidermal growth factor 2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer. <b>Methods:</b> Abemaciclib adherence was computed as the ratio between the total number of cycles/months that medication was supplied and the months between the first and the last prescription. The proportion of Days Covered (PDC) ranged from 0 to 1. A score of 0.8 (i.e., 80% adherence rate) was the cutoff used to classify the patients as adherent (0.8 ≤ PDC ≤ 1) or non-adherent (0 ≤ PDC < 0.8). The received dose intensity was also calculated. <b>Results:</b> The abemaciclib pharmacy claims of 100 women with HR+/HER2- breast cancer were retrieved. Most patients (91%) were treated in the advanced setting. Abemaciclib was more frequently taken with an aromatase inhibitor (63%) than with fulvestrant (27%). In this population, the adherence rate was high (92.25% + 1.939 SD). The proportion of non-adherent patients taking abemaciclib with PDC <0.8 was 12%. There was a significative correlation between the occurrence of side effects and the use of <5 drugs for non-oncological illnesses, probably reflecting concomitant non-oncological diseases. <b>Conclusions:</b> Adherence to abemaciclib-based therapy is high in a real-life setting, pending the adequate and proactive management of patients. The careful evaluation of patients and detailed information about expected adverse events are essential to ensure adherence to this antineoplastic agent.

BiomedicinesVol. 13(3)
Università degli Studi di Enna Kore (IT), University of Catania (IT), Ospedale Cannizzaro (IT), Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico "Paolo Giaccone" di Palermo (IT), Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I (IT), University of Palermo (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
4.56
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.