Navigating the AI frontier: Insights from the Ukraine conflict for NATO’s governance role in military AI

As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly integrated in the military domain, calls for its regulation are growing. In this paper, I argue that although civil society, academics and citizens support the strong regulation of military AI, such regulation is unlikely to materialise, even less so via formal organisations such as NATO. The current war, in which Ukraine is defending itself against a Russian invasion, underscores three key reasons for this: blurred borders with the civilian sector; the weaponisation of civilian life; and meaningful steps towards autonomy. Given these factors, the paper argues that behavioural steps are most likely to be feasible in the short term.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Strategic Studies
Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2025.2463451
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.56

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating the AI frontier: Insights from the Ukraine conflict for NATO’s governance role in military AI

Michal Onderčo
7 citations
Journal of Strategic Studies
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
16.56
article

Navigating the AI frontier: Insights from the Ukraine conflict for NATO’s governance role in military AI

Michal Onderčo
article en
7 citations

Abstract

As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly integrated in the military domain, calls for its regulation are growing. In this paper, I argue that although civil society, academics and citizens support the strong regulation of military AI, such regulation is unlikely to materialise, even less so via formal organisations such as NATO. The current war, in which Ukraine is defending itself against a Russian invasion, underscores three key reasons for this: blurred borders with the civilian sector; the weaponisation of civilian life; and meaningful steps towards autonomy. Given these factors, the paper argues that behavioural steps are most likely to be feasible in the short term.

Journal of Strategic StudiesVol. 48(3)
Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Arthur Foundation, Ministerie van Buitenlandse Zaken, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard University, Harvard Kennedy School
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
16.56
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.