Mathematical Models of Critical Soft Error in Synchronous and Self-Timed Pipeline

This paper analyzes the impact of a single soft error on the performance of a synchronous and self-timed pipeline. A nuclear particle running through the integrated circuit body is considered the most probable soft error source. The existing estimates show that self-timed circuits offer an advantage in terms of single soft error tolerance. The paper proves these estimates on the basis of a comparative probability analysis of a critical fault in two types of pipelines. The mathematical models derived in the paper describe the probability of a critical fault depending on the circuit’s characteristics, its operating discipline, and the soft error parameters. The self-timed pipeline operates in accordance with a two-phase discipline, based on the request–acknowledge interaction within the pipeline’s stages, which provides it with increased immunity to soft errors. Quantitative calculations performed on the basis of the derived mathematical models show that the self-timed pipeline has about 6.1 times better tolerance to a single soft error in comparison to its synchronous counterpart. The obtained results are in good agreement with empirical estimates of the soft error tolerance level of synchronous and self-timed circuits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mathematics
Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/math13050695
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Radiation Effects in Electronics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.19

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mathematical Models of Critical Soft Error in Synchronous and Self-Timed Pipeline

Yuri Diachenko, Dmitry Khilko, Igor Sokolov, Yuri Stepchenkov
3 citations
Mathematics
Radiation Effects in Electronics
2.19
article

Mathematical Models of Critical Soft Error in Synchronous and Self-Timed Pipeline

Yuri Diachenko, Dmitry Khilko, Igor Sokolov, Yuri Stepchenkov
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This paper analyzes the impact of a single soft error on the performance of a synchronous and self-timed pipeline. A nuclear particle running through the integrated circuit body is considered the most probable soft error source. The existing estimates show that self-timed circuits offer an advantage in terms of single soft error tolerance. The paper proves these estimates on the basis of a comparative probability analysis of a critical fault in two types of pipelines. The mathematical models derived in the paper describe the probability of a critical fault depending on the circuit’s characteristics, its operating discipline, and the soft error parameters. The self-timed pipeline operates in accordance with a two-phase discipline, based on the request–acknowledge interaction within the pipeline’s stages, which provides it with increased immunity to soft errors. Quantitative calculations performed on the basis of the derived mathematical models show that the self-timed pipeline has about 6.1 times better tolerance to a single soft error in comparison to its synchronous counterpart. The obtained results are in good agreement with empirical estimates of the soft error tolerance level of synchronous and self-timed circuits.

MathematicsVol. 13(5)
Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Radiation Effects in Electronics
2.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Mathematical Models of Critical Soft Error in Synchronous and Self-Timed Pipeline — Yuri Diachenko, Dmitry Khilko, et al. · Mathematics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS