Language Models and Dialect Differences

The advancements in automatic language processing being ushered in by Large Language Models suggest enormous potential for better personalization during student learning. However, this potential can be best exploited if we know that LLMs are equally capable of interacting with students who speak or write in a range of different dialects. This case study uses systematically manipulated student essays, previously evaluated by human raters, to examine how ChatGPT responds to and addresses specific dialect differences. Results point to important concerns about the potential biases and limitations of both LLMs and humans when evaluating and providing feedback to students who use minoritized dialects. Addressing these concerns is critical for the field of learning analytics, as it seeks to ensure equity and asset-based approaches to learning analytics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3706468.3706496
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Language Models and Dialect Differences

Xiner Liu, Andres Felipe Zambrano, Jaclyn Ocumpaugh
1 citations
Natural Language Processing Techniques
2.48
article

Language Models and Dialect Differences

Xiner Liu, Andres Felipe Zambrano, Jaclyn Ocumpaugh
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The advancements in automatic language processing being ushered in by Large Language Models suggest enormous potential for better personalization during student learning. However, this potential can be best exploited if we know that LLMs are equally capable of interacting with students who speak or write in a range of different dialects. This case study uses systematically manipulated student essays, previously evaluated by human raters, to examine how ChatGPT responds to and addresses specific dialect differences. Results point to important concerns about the potential biases and limitations of both LLMs and humans when evaluating and providing feedback to students who use minoritized dialects. Addressing these concerns is critical for the field of learning analytics, as it seeks to ensure equity and asset-based approaches to learning analytics.

University of Pennsylvania (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Natural Language Processing Techniques
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.