The Company You Keep: Refining Neural Epistemic Network Analysis

Collaborative problem-solving (CPS) is defined as an inherently sociocognitive phenomena. Despite this, extant learning analytic techniques tend to focus on either the social or cognitive aspects without explicitly considering their interaction. Prior work developed Neural Epistemic Network Analysis (NENA), which used a combination of deep learning methods to simultaneously model the social and cognitive aspects of CPS; however, the method had several limitations. The refined version of NENA presented here addresses these limitations by (a) introducing a simplified autoencoder deep learning architecture; (b) using a combination of social and epistemic networks as input to preserve interpretability in terms of social and cognitive factors; and (c) introducing an isometry loss function to ensure downstream statistical tests are meaningful. We found that the refined version of NENA is able to achieve high performance on criteria we would expect from a network analytic technique in the context of learning analytics: interpretability, goodness of fit, orthogonality and isometry; and discriminatory power. We also demonstrated that this method was comparable in performance to a more traditional learning analytic technique, Epistemic Network Analysis (ENA), while providing information that ENA did not. The results suggest that NENA could be a useful method for exploring the cognitive interactions of a given individual's social network and thus the influences their network exerts upon them.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3706468.3706497
Primary Topic
Cognitive Science and Education Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Company You Keep: Refining Neural Epistemic Network Analysis

Zachari Swiecki, Zheng Fang, Guanliang Chen, Weiqing Wang
Cognitive Science and Education Research
article

The Company You Keep: Refining Neural Epistemic Network Analysis

Zachari Swiecki, Zheng Fang, Guanliang Chen, Weiqing Wang
article en

Abstract

Collaborative problem-solving (CPS) is defined as an inherently sociocognitive phenomena. Despite this, extant learning analytic techniques tend to focus on either the social or cognitive aspects without explicitly considering their interaction. Prior work developed Neural Epistemic Network Analysis (NENA), which used a combination of deep learning methods to simultaneously model the social and cognitive aspects of CPS; however, the method had several limitations. The refined version of NENA presented here addresses these limitations by (a) introducing a simplified autoencoder deep learning architecture; (b) using a combination of social and epistemic networks as input to preserve interpretability in terms of social and cognitive factors; and (c) introducing an isometry loss function to ensure downstream statistical tests are meaningful. We found that the refined version of NENA is able to achieve high performance on criteria we would expect from a network analytic technique in the context of learning analytics: interpretability, goodness of fit, orthogonality and isometry; and discriminatory power. We also demonstrated that this method was comparable in performance to a more traditional learning analytic technique, Epistemic Network Analysis (ENA), while providing information that ENA did not. The results suggest that NENA could be a useful method for exploring the cognitive interactions of a given individual's social network and thus the influences their network exerts upon them.

Monash University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Cognitive Science and Education Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.