Digital Finance, Digital Usage Divide, and Urban–Rural Income Gap: Evidence from China

Digital finance can reduce the urban–rural income gap, but the digital divide may limit this effect. This study develops a theoretical framework to explore the interactions between digital finance, the digital usage gap, and income disparity. Using data from 274 Chinese cities, the research applies a two-way fixed-effects and threshold effect model. The results indicate that disparities in digital usage not only diminish but may also distort the convergence benefits of digital finance, producing a U-shaped relationship that exhibits variability across dimensions and regions. Additionally, traditional financial systems appear to moderate this U-shaped pattern by delaying the point at which digital finance begins to widen the urban–rural income gap. However, the extent of this alleviation is influenced by the digital usage is divisive. Once digital technology adoption exceeds a threshold, the negative effect becomes positive, narrowing the urban–rural income gap. Consequently, policy initiatives should prioritize improving financial conditions in rural areas, accelerating the digital transformation of conventional finance, bolstering digital education in rural regions, and addressing the disparities in digital usage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Systems
Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13030145
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
18.79
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital Finance, Digital Usage Divide, and Urban–Rural Income Gap: Evidence from China

Minghui Yin, Yunbo Xiang, Yanfei Xiao, Huilin Wang
6 citations
Systems
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
18.79
article

Digital Finance, Digital Usage Divide, and Urban–Rural Income Gap: Evidence from China

Minghui Yin, Yunbo Xiang, Yanfei Xiao, Huilin Wang
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Digital finance can reduce the urban–rural income gap, but the digital divide may limit this effect. This study develops a theoretical framework to explore the interactions between digital finance, the digital usage gap, and income disparity. Using data from 274 Chinese cities, the research applies a two-way fixed-effects and threshold effect model. The results indicate that disparities in digital usage not only diminish but may also distort the convergence benefits of digital finance, producing a U-shaped relationship that exhibits variability across dimensions and regions. Additionally, traditional financial systems appear to moderate this U-shaped pattern by delaying the point at which digital finance begins to widen the urban–rural income gap. However, the extent of this alleviation is influenced by the digital usage is divisive. Once digital technology adoption exceeds a threshold, the negative effect becomes positive, narrowing the urban–rural income gap. Consequently, policy initiatives should prioritize improving financial conditions in rural areas, accelerating the digital transformation of conventional finance, bolstering digital education in rural regions, and addressing the disparities in digital usage.

SystemsVol. 13(3)
Hunan University of Science and Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
18.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Digital Finance, Digital Usage Divide, and Urban–Rural Income Gap: Evidence from China — Minghui Yin, Yunbo Xiang, et al. · Systems (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS