Assessment for inclusion: Promoting equity and justice in Disability Assessment Boards in India

This case study involves a successful medical aspirant with 88% mobility disability who was denied admission by the Disability Assessment Board (DAB). After failing to get relief from the High Court, the candidate challenged the decision in the Supreme Court. The Court ordered a reassessment by another DAB but found their approach - based on the medical model of disability - unsatisfactory. Consequently, the Court directed an independent functional competency assessment conducted by a doctor with a disability. The new assessment adopted a human rights model of disability while offering opportunities such as simulation labs and detailed discussions on clinical accommodations to assess his abilities rather than focusing on his disability. The Supreme Court endorsed the ability-based assessment, critiqued the National Medical Commission's guidelines, and ordered the candidate's admission. Additionally, the Court directed the regulator to revise the existing guidelines, considering technological advancements, disability justice, and input from doctors with disabilities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indian Journal of Medical Ethics
Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20529/ijme.2025.015
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Higher Education Learning Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment for inclusion: Promoting equity and justice in Disability Assessment Boards in India

R. K. Bajaj, Satendra Singh, Punit K. Dhawan, Om Rathod
1 citations
Indian Journal of Medical Ethics
Higher Education Learning Practices
8.93
article

Assessment for inclusion: Promoting equity and justice in Disability Assessment Boards in India

R. K. Bajaj, Satendra Singh, Punit K. Dhawan, Om Rathod
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This case study involves a successful medical aspirant with 88% mobility disability who was denied admission by the Disability Assessment Board (DAB). After failing to get relief from the High Court, the candidate challenged the decision in the Supreme Court. The Court ordered a reassessment by another DAB but found their approach - based on the medical model of disability - unsatisfactory. Consequently, the Court directed an independent functional competency assessment conducted by a doctor with a disability. The new assessment adopted a human rights model of disability while offering opportunities such as simulation labs and detailed discussions on clinical accommodations to assess his abilities rather than focusing on his disability. The Supreme Court endorsed the ability-based assessment, critiqued the National Medical Commission's guidelines, and ordered the candidate's admission. Additionally, the Court directed the regulator to revise the existing guidelines, considering technological advancements, disability justice, and input from doctors with disabilities.

Indian Journal of Medical EthicsVol. 10(2)
Government Medical College (IN), University College of Medical Sciences (IN), Supreme Court of Virginia (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Higher Education Learning Practices
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessment for inclusion: Promoting equity and justice in Disability Assessment Boards in India — R. K. Bajaj, Satendra Singh, et al. · Indian Journal of Medical Ethics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS