Will they or won't they make it in time? The role of contextual and behavioral predictors in reaching deadlines of mandatory assignments

Procrastination and other forms of irrational delay are widespread among university students, leading to an array of potential negative consequences. While the reasons for this type of behavior are manifold and many facilitating factors have been identified, which of these factors are able to predict dilatory behavior in online/distance education has received comparatively little attention in the literature so far. In this study, we intended to compare the performance of two sets of objective predictors of delay, namely contextual variables based on characteristics of the assignment, and behavioral variables based on log data. Using historical data drawn from our university's learning management system, we calculated Bayesian multilevel models. The strongest and most consistent predictors of dilatory behavior turned out to be interval between the first click on the assignment and its deadline, the interval between the start of a block and the first click on the assignment, the number of clicks on the assignment, and the deadline type. The combination of both sets of predictors slightly improved the model's performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3706468.3706514
Primary Topic
Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Will they or won't they make it in time? The role of contextual and behavioral predictors in reaching deadlines of mandatory assignments

Christof Imhof, Martin Hlosta, Per Bergamin
Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
article

Will they or won't they make it in time? The role of contextual and behavioral predictors in reaching deadlines of mandatory assignments

Christof Imhof, Martin Hlosta, Per Bergamin
article en

Abstract

Procrastination and other forms of irrational delay are widespread among university students, leading to an array of potential negative consequences. While the reasons for this type of behavior are manifold and many facilitating factors have been identified, which of these factors are able to predict dilatory behavior in online/distance education has received comparatively little attention in the literature so far. In this study, we intended to compare the performance of two sets of objective predictors of delay, namely contextual variables based on characteristics of the assignment, and behavioral variables based on log data. Using historical data drawn from our university's learning management system, we calculated Bayesian multilevel models. The strongest and most consistent predictors of dilatory behavior turned out to be interval between the first click on the assignment and its deadline, the interval between the start of a block and the first click on the assignment, the number of clicks on the assignment, and the deadline type. The combination of both sets of predictors slightly improved the model's performance.

North-West University (ZA), Swiss Distance University of Applied Sciences (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.