Exploring students’ epistemic orientation, learning trajectories, and outcomes

The influence of students’ epistemic orientations on their learning behavior and outcomes is well-documented. However, limited research explores students’ epistemic orientations in terms of conceptual engagement and learning outcomes. This study, set within the context of higher education, examined the patterns of conceptual engagement among two performance groups and identifies differences in their epistemic orientations. Both epistemic network analysis (ENA) and ordered network analysis (ONA) methods were used. The results from the ENA revealed distinct trajectories and patterns of conceptual engagement between high-performing and low-performing students during different periods in their learning journey. High-performing students were able to establish a more interconnected and distributed epistemic network earlier than their low-performing counterparts. ONA results revealed that (1) high-performing students were more inclined to employ abstract theoretical concepts to address empirical concerns, doing so more frequently and earlier; and (2) low-performing students benefitted from forum interactions with high-performing students to expand their knowledge resources and engagement with theoretical constructs over time. These discoveries contribute to our comprehension of epistemic orientations in different learners. The implications of this study could help generate learning analytics that monitor students’ conceptual engagement in forum discussion and provide feedback to guide the design of learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3706468.3706509
Primary Topic
Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring students’ epistemic orientation, learning trajectories, and outcomes

Nancy Law, Cong Liu, David Williamson Shaffer, Pakon Ko et al.
Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
article

Exploring students’ epistemic orientation, learning trajectories, and outcomes

Nancy Law, Cong Liu, David Williamson Shaffer, Pakon Ko, Yuanru Tan
article en

Abstract

The influence of students’ epistemic orientations on their learning behavior and outcomes is well-documented. However, limited research explores students’ epistemic orientations in terms of conceptual engagement and learning outcomes. This study, set within the context of higher education, examined the patterns of conceptual engagement among two performance groups and identifies differences in their epistemic orientations. Both epistemic network analysis (ENA) and ordered network analysis (ONA) methods were used. The results from the ENA revealed distinct trajectories and patterns of conceptual engagement between high-performing and low-performing students during different periods in their learning journey. High-performing students were able to establish a more interconnected and distributed epistemic network earlier than their low-performing counterparts. ONA results revealed that (1) high-performing students were more inclined to employ abstract theoretical concepts to address empirical concerns, doing so more frequently and earlier; and (2) low-performing students benefitted from forum interactions with high-performing students to expand their knowledge resources and engagement with theoretical constructs over time. These discoveries contribute to our comprehension of epistemic orientations in different learners. The implications of this study could help generate learning analytics that monitor students’ conceptual engagement in forum discussion and provide feedback to guide the design of learning.

University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Exploring students’ epistemic orientation, learning trajectories, and outcomes — Nancy Law, Cong Liu, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS