Interpreting DESI 2024 BAO: Late-time dynamical dark energy or a local effect?

We perform fits to DESI, CMB, and supernova data to understand the physical origin of the DESI hint for dynamical dark energy. We find that the parametrization $w={w}_{0}+(1\ensuremath{-}a){w}_{a}$ can, misleadingly, hint for a phantom Universe, although quintessence models fit the data well. Model-independently, we find that deviations from $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}\mathrm{CDM}$ are driven by low-$z$ supernova data and take place only at very low redshifts $z<0.1$. Therefore, either our Universe underwent dramatic changes very recently or we do not fully understand our local Universe in a radius of about $300\text{ }\text{ }{h}^{\ensuremath{-}1}\text{ }\mathrm{Mpc}$.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.111.043540
Citations
83
Primary Topic
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
95.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interpreting DESI 2024 BAO: Late-time dynamical dark energy or a local effect?

Ioannis D. Gialamas, Antonio Racioppi, M. Raidal, Gert Hütsi et al.
83 citations
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
95.85
article

Interpreting DESI 2024 BAO: Late-time dynamical dark energy or a local effect?

Ioannis D. Gialamas, Antonio Racioppi, M. Raidal, Gert Hütsi, Martin Vasar, Hardi Veermäe, Kristjan Kannike
article en
83 citations

Abstract

We perform fits to DESI, CMB, and supernova data to understand the physical origin of the DESI hint for dynamical dark energy. We find that the parametrization $w={w}_{0}+(1\ensuremath{-}a){w}_{a}$ can, misleadingly, hint for a phantom Universe, although quintessence models fit the data well. Model-independently, we find that deviations from $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}\mathrm{CDM}$ are driven by low-$z$ supernova data and take place only at very low redshifts $z<0.1$. Therefore, either our Universe underwent dramatic changes very recently or we do not fully understand our local Universe in a radius of about $300\text{ }\text{ }{h}^{\ensuremath{-}1}\text{ }\mathrm{Mpc}$.

Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Vol. 111(4)
National Institute of Chemical Physics and Biophysics (EE)
Eesti Teadusagentuur
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
95.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.