Injecting solid particles into the stratosphere could mitigate global warming but currently entails great uncertainties

Stratospheric aerosol injection could mitigate harmful effects of global warming, but could have undesirable side effects, such as warming the stratosphere and depleting the ozone layer. We explore the potential benefits of solid alumina and calcite particles as alternatives to sulfate aerosols by using an experimentally informed aerosol-chemistry-climate model. Compared to sulfur dioxide, injection of solids reduces stratospheric warming by up to 70% and diffuse radiation by up to 40%, highlighting their potential benefits. Achieving -1 W m<sup>-2</sup> of radiative forcing would likely result in very small ozone changes, but sizable uncertainties remain. These arise from poorly understood heterogeneous chemical and microphysical processes, which, under less likely assumptions, could lead to larger global ozone column changes between -14% and +4%. Our work provides recommendations for improving the understanding of stratospheric aerosol injection using materials other than sulfur dioxide, and underscores the need for kinetic laboratory studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Earth & Environment
Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02038-1
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Climate Change and Geoengineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.53

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Injecting solid particles into the stratosphere could mitigate global warming but currently entails great uncertainties

Sandro Vattioni, Timofei Sukhodolov, Beiping Luo, Frank N. Keutsch et al.
5 citations
Communications Earth & Environment
Climate Change and Geoengineering
5.53
article

Injecting solid particles into the stratosphere could mitigate global warming but currently entails great uncertainties

Sandro Vattioni, Timofei Sukhodolov, Beiping Luo, Frank N. Keutsch, Markus Ammann, J. A. Dykema, Andrea Stenke, Georgios A. Kelesidis, Gabriel Chiodo, M. Döbeli, Aryeh I. Feinberg, Christof Vockenhuber, Thomas Peter, Rahel Weber
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Stratospheric aerosol injection could mitigate harmful effects of global warming, but could have undesirable side effects, such as warming the stratosphere and depleting the ozone layer. We explore the potential benefits of solid alumina and calcite particles as alternatives to sulfate aerosols by using an experimentally informed aerosol-chemistry-climate model. Compared to sulfur dioxide, injection of solids reduces stratospheric warming by up to 70% and diffuse radiation by up to 40%, highlighting their potential benefits. Achieving -1 W m<sup>-2</sup> of radiative forcing would likely result in very small ozone changes, but sizable uncertainties remain. These arise from poorly understood heterogeneous chemical and microphysical processes, which, under less likely assumptions, could lead to larger global ozone column changes between -14% and +4%. Our work provides recommendations for improving the understanding of stratospheric aerosol injection using materials other than sulfur dioxide, and underscores the need for kinetic laboratory studies.

Communications Earth & EnvironmentVol. 6(1)
Planetary Science Institute (US), Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss (CH), Harvard University (US), Harvard University Press (US), Paul Scherrer Institute (CH), ETH Zurich (CH), Institute of Particle Physics (CA), Physikalisch-Meteorologisches Observatorium Davos (CH), Ion Beam Applications (France) (FR), Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias de la Alimentación (ES), Instituto de Geociencias (ES), Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (CH), Delft University of Technology (NL)
National Science Foundation, Simons Foundation, European Commission, Science Foundation Ireland, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Climate Change and Geoengineering
5.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.