Crude Oil Curtailment and Collusion: Heterodox Trade War Strategies for Canada

This paper examines two non-traditional retaliation strategies that Canada could employ in response to U.S. import tariffs during a trade war: i) crude oil production curtailment and ii) potential exemptions to Canada’s Competition Act. Unlike traditional retaliatory tariffs or export restrictions, these measures could provide economic benefits to Canada rather than exacerbating the negative impacts of U.S. tariffs. While this paper does not advocate for any specific course of action, it highlights the need for policymakers to consider innovative and pragmatic responses to U.S. trade aggression. Crude oil curtailment and competition law exemptions present unconventional but potentially effective strategies for mitigating the adverse effects of tariffs while safeguarding Canada’s economic interests. Both strategies are preferred to export restrictions and export taxes. Nonetheless, their success in compelling U.S. policy changes remains uncertain and further analysis is required to fully assess their implications before implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The School of Public Policy Publications
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55016/ojs/sppp.v18i1.80954
Primary Topic
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Crude Oil Curtailment and Collusion: Heterodox Trade War Strategies for Canada

G. Kent Fellows
The School of Public Policy Publications
Market Dynamics and Volatility
article

Crude Oil Curtailment and Collusion: Heterodox Trade War Strategies for Canada

G. Kent Fellows
article en

Abstract

This paper examines two non-traditional retaliation strategies that Canada could employ in response to U.S. import tariffs during a trade war: i) crude oil production curtailment and ii) potential exemptions to Canada’s Competition Act. Unlike traditional retaliatory tariffs or export restrictions, these measures could provide economic benefits to Canada rather than exacerbating the negative impacts of U.S. tariffs. While this paper does not advocate for any specific course of action, it highlights the need for policymakers to consider innovative and pragmatic responses to U.S. trade aggression. Crude oil curtailment and competition law exemptions present unconventional but potentially effective strategies for mitigating the adverse effects of tariffs while safeguarding Canada’s economic interests. Both strategies are preferred to export restrictions and export taxes. Nonetheless, their success in compelling U.S. policy changes remains uncertain and further analysis is required to fully assess their implications before implementation.

The School of Public Policy PublicationsVol. 18(1)
University of Calgary (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Market Dynamics and Volatility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Crude Oil Curtailment and Collusion: Heterodox Trade War Strategies for Canada — G. Kent Fellows · The School of Public Policy Publications (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS