Cancers Detected on Supplemental Breast Ultrasound in Women With Dense Breasts: Update From a Canadian Centre

<b>Objective:</b> Breast ultrasound is one of several tools proposed for supplemental screening of women with dense breasts but is not widely available in Canada. <b>Methods:</b> An IRB-approved, evaluation of ultrasound-guided breast biopsies prompted by screening breast ultrasound performed from August 1, 2021, to December 31, 2022, offered to asymptomatic women with category C and D breast tissue density after normal screening mammography (2D) in the provincial organized screening program, or surveillance diagnostic mammography after breast cancer. Risk factors, stage (AJCC 8th ed), incremental cancer detection rate (ICDR), biopsy rates, and positive predictive values for biopsy (PPV3) were evaluated. <b>Results:</b> 5257 women were screened, yielding 247 women (ages 34-82, median age of 56) who underwent biopsies (281 masses), 32 of whom were diagnosed with breast cancer, 27 invasive and 5 DCIS for PPV3 13.0% (32/247), and ICDR 6.1/1000. Ductal cancers found were stage 0 in 5/32 (15.6%), stage 1A in 18/32 (56.3%), and stage 1B in 2/32 (6.3%), 1 ductal/lobular cancer was stage 3B (3.1%), 5 lobular cancers (16.6%) were stage 1A (1), 1B (2), and 2B (2) and 1 adenoid cystic carcinoma was stage 2A (3.1%); 3 cancers were found on incident and 29 on prevalent screens, 27 (84.4%) in category c and 20 (62.5%) in women with no personal or first-degree family history of breast cancer. <b>Conclusion:</b> A high ICDR for screening breast ultrasound of 6.1/1000 was found. <b>Clinical Relevance Statement:</b> In women with dense breasts screened with 2D mammography where access to supplemental screening with MRI and contrast mammography is limited, supplemental screening ultrasound can play a significant role in cancer detection with a high ICDR in women in both category c and d densities that is higher than in jurisdictions offering annual screening mammography, or where MRI is used for surveillance after cancer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal
Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08465371251318578
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.36
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cancers Detected on Supplemental Breast Ultrasound in Women With Dense Breasts: Update From a Canadian Centre

Linda Warren, Jean M. Seely, Paula B. Gordon
8 citations
Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
8.36
article

Cancers Detected on Supplemental Breast Ultrasound in Women With Dense Breasts: Update From a Canadian Centre

Linda Warren, Jean M. Seely, Paula B. Gordon
article en
8 citations

Abstract

<b>Objective:</b> Breast ultrasound is one of several tools proposed for supplemental screening of women with dense breasts but is not widely available in Canada. <b>Methods:</b> An IRB-approved, evaluation of ultrasound-guided breast biopsies prompted by screening breast ultrasound performed from August 1, 2021, to December 31, 2022, offered to asymptomatic women with category C and D breast tissue density after normal screening mammography (2D) in the provincial organized screening program, or surveillance diagnostic mammography after breast cancer. Risk factors, stage (AJCC 8th ed), incremental cancer detection rate (ICDR), biopsy rates, and positive predictive values for biopsy (PPV3) were evaluated. <b>Results:</b> 5257 women were screened, yielding 247 women (ages 34-82, median age of 56) who underwent biopsies (281 masses), 32 of whom were diagnosed with breast cancer, 27 invasive and 5 DCIS for PPV3 13.0% (32/247), and ICDR 6.1/1000. Ductal cancers found were stage 0 in 5/32 (15.6%), stage 1A in 18/32 (56.3%), and stage 1B in 2/32 (6.3%), 1 ductal/lobular cancer was stage 3B (3.1%), 5 lobular cancers (16.6%) were stage 1A (1), 1B (2), and 2B (2) and 1 adenoid cystic carcinoma was stage 2A (3.1%); 3 cancers were found on incident and 29 on prevalent screens, 27 (84.4%) in category c and 20 (62.5%) in women with no personal or first-degree family history of breast cancer. <b>Conclusion:</b> A high ICDR for screening breast ultrasound of 6.1/1000 was found. <b>Clinical Relevance Statement:</b> In women with dense breasts screened with 2D mammography where access to supplemental screening with MRI and contrast mammography is limited, supplemental screening ultrasound can play a significant role in cancer detection with a high ICDR in women in both category c and d densities that is higher than in jurisdictions offering annual screening mammography, or where MRI is used for surveillance after cancer.

Canadian Association of Radiologists JournalVol. 76(3)
University of British Columbia (CA), University of Ottawa (CA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
8.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.