Improving quantitative ventifact analysis for climate investigations using the Dyngjusandur sandsheet in Iceland as a planetary analogue

We use the Dyngjusandur sandsheet, Iceland, as a testbed to assess the type and number of measurements required to accurately represent ventifact orientations and extract palaeowind information through a statistical evaluation of the differences between photogrammetric based and in situ measurements of ventifact feature orientations. Forty representative ventifacts were selected for in situ measurement, 20 of which were imaged for photogrammetric analysis to produce oriented and scaled virtual 3D models. An additional set of measurements were made on the ‘synthetic’ models to allow for statistical assessment of erosional feature orientation. Despite the similarity between the photogrammetric (1145 measurements) and the in situ datasets (500 measurements), there are small but significant differences in mean feature orientation that become more pronounced as sample size is reduced. Results indicate that in situ and photogrammetric methods of measuring feature orientation are comparable (to within 2° ± 2° at 1 <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi>σ</mml:mi> </mml:math> ( n = 20) for inferring palaeowind directions), but photogrammetric analyses require less time for data acquisition (by a factor of 0.36–0.66) and yield over five times (5.16 times) as many measurements per ventifact, with additional advantages of being able to examine digital objects under different illumination conditions and magnifications, and from angles that are otherwise not possible in the field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Geological Society
Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2024-173
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.79

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving quantitative ventifact analysis for climate investigations using the Dyngjusandur sandsheet in Iceland as a planetary analogue

P. Whelley, Christopher W. Hamilton, S. P. Scheidt, Ingrid Ukstins Peate et al.
1 citations
Journal of the Geological Society
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
1.79
article

Improving quantitative ventifact analysis for climate investigations using the Dyngjusandur sandsheet in Iceland as a planetary analogue

P. Whelley, Christopher W. Hamilton, S. P. Scheidt, Ingrid Ukstins Peate, D.W. Peate, Samuel Xavier Hudziak
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We use the Dyngjusandur sandsheet, Iceland, as a testbed to assess the type and number of measurements required to accurately represent ventifact orientations and extract palaeowind information through a statistical evaluation of the differences between photogrammetric based and in situ measurements of ventifact feature orientations. Forty representative ventifacts were selected for in situ measurement, 20 of which were imaged for photogrammetric analysis to produce oriented and scaled virtual 3D models. An additional set of measurements were made on the ‘synthetic’ models to allow for statistical assessment of erosional feature orientation. Despite the similarity between the photogrammetric (1145 measurements) and the in situ datasets (500 measurements), there are small but significant differences in mean feature orientation that become more pronounced as sample size is reduced. Results indicate that in situ and photogrammetric methods of measuring feature orientation are comparable (to within 2° ± 2° at 1 <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi>σ</mml:mi> </mml:math> ( n = 20) for inferring palaeowind directions), but photogrammetric analyses require less time for data acquisition (by a factor of 0.36–0.66) and yield over five times (5.16 times) as many measurements per ventifact, with additional advantages of being able to examine digital objects under different illumination conditions and magnifications, and from angles that are otherwise not possible in the field.

Journal of the Geological SocietyVol. 182(3)
University of Iowa (US), Goddard Space Flight Center (US), University of Arizona (US), University of Auckland (NZ), Lunar and Planetary Institute (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Goddard Space Flight Center
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
1.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.