Effect of the employed soil constitutive model on the response of large-span soil steel bridges to soil and truck loading

Current design codes and standards recommend refined analysis methods to accurately predict the behaviour of large-span soil-metal bridges. Consequently, the FE modelling of these structures must employ an appropriate constitutive model for the soil capable of mimicking its performance under various loading conditions. This study investigates the influence of different soil constitutive models on the performance of soil-steel arch bridges with spans up to 32.4 m. A comprehensive analysis was performed using a validated 3D finite element model to evaluate the suitability of three widely adopted soil models: the Mohr-Coulomb (MC) model, the Hardening Soil (HS) model, and the Hardening Soil model with small-strain stiffness (HSs). The results indicate that the choice of soil model significantly affects the predicted structural response. The MC model consistently overestimates the settlement and lateral displacement of the foundations, particularly for larger spans, while underestimating upward deformations of the culvert crown during backfilling. Under traffic loading, the MC model underestimated the outward bending moment at the culvert crown by up to 83 % for smaller spans but showed a reduced discrepancy for larger spans. Overall, the HS and HSs models provided more accurate predictions of the vertical and lateral displacements, bending moments, and thrust forces. The findings underscore the importance of selecting an appropriate soil model in finite element analyses to ensure reliable design and safe performance of soil-steel composite structures. • Soil-structure interaction of large-span soil steel bridges. • The choice of soil model significantly affects the predicted structural response • The MC model consistently overestimates the settlement and lateral displacement of the foundations. • Overall, the HS and HSs models provided more accurate predictions of the displacements, bending moments, and thrust forces.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Constructional Steel Research
Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2025.109436
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.81

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of the employed soil constitutive model on the response of large-span soil steel bridges to soil and truck loading

John Newhook, Ahmed Elsawwaf, Hany El Naggar
4 citations
Journal of Constructional Steel Research
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
3.81
article

Effect of the employed soil constitutive model on the response of large-span soil steel bridges to soil and truck loading

John Newhook, Ahmed Elsawwaf, Hany El Naggar
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Current design codes and standards recommend refined analysis methods to accurately predict the behaviour of large-span soil-metal bridges. Consequently, the FE modelling of these structures must employ an appropriate constitutive model for the soil capable of mimicking its performance under various loading conditions. This study investigates the influence of different soil constitutive models on the performance of soil-steel arch bridges with spans up to 32.4 m. A comprehensive analysis was performed using a validated 3D finite element model to evaluate the suitability of three widely adopted soil models: the Mohr-Coulomb (MC) model, the Hardening Soil (HS) model, and the Hardening Soil model with small-strain stiffness (HSs). The results indicate that the choice of soil model significantly affects the predicted structural response. The MC model consistently overestimates the settlement and lateral displacement of the foundations, particularly for larger spans, while underestimating upward deformations of the culvert crown during backfilling. Under traffic loading, the MC model underestimated the outward bending moment at the culvert crown by up to 83 % for smaller spans but showed a reduced discrepancy for larger spans. Overall, the HS and HSs models provided more accurate predictions of the vertical and lateral displacements, bending moments, and thrust forces. The findings underscore the importance of selecting an appropriate soil model in finite element analyses to ensure reliable design and safe performance of soil-steel composite structures. • Soil-structure interaction of large-span soil steel bridges. • The choice of soil model significantly affects the predicted structural response • The MC model consistently overestimates the settlement and lateral displacement of the foundations. • Overall, the HS and HSs models provided more accurate predictions of the displacements, bending moments, and thrust forces.

Journal of Constructional Steel ResearchVol. 228
Dalhousie University (CA)
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
3.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.