Applying deep learning to teleseismic phase detection and picking: PcP and PKiKP cases

The availability of a tremendous amount of seismic data demands seismological researchers to analyze seismic phases efficiently. Recently, deep learning algorithms exhibit a powerful capability of detecting and picking on P- and S-wave phases. However, it remains a challenge to effeciently process enormous teleseismic phases, which are crucial to probe Earth's interior structures and their dynamics. In this study, we propose a scheme to detect and pick teleseismic phases, such as seismic phase that reflects off the core-mantle boundary (i.e., PcP) and that reflects off the inner-core boundary (i.e., PKiKP), from a seismic dataset in Japan. The scheme consists of three steps: 1) latent phase traces are truncated from the whole seismogram with theoretical arrival times; 2) latent phases are recognized and evaluated by convolutional neural network (CNN) models; 3) arrivals of good or fair phase are picked with another CNN models. The testing detection result on 7386 seismograms shows that the scheme recognizes 92.15% and 94.13% of PcP and PKiKP phases. The testing picking result has a mean absolute error of 0.0742 s and 0.0636 s for the PcP and PKiKP phases, respectively. These seismograms were processed in just 5 min for phase detection and picking, demonstrating the efficiency of the proposed scheme in automatic teleseismic phase analysis. • A deep learning-based scheme is proposed for automated and efficient processing of teleseismic phases. • The validation with two teleseismic phases, PcP and PKiKP, demonstrate high detection accuracies and low picking errors. • Deep-learning picking of first peaks is more effective than picking first breaks of teleseismic phases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Artificial Intelligence in Geosciences
Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiig.2025.100108
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Applying deep learning to teleseismic phase detection and picking: PcP and PKiKP cases

Congcong Yuan, Jie Zhang
2 citations
Artificial Intelligence in Geosciences
Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
3.73
article

Applying deep learning to teleseismic phase detection and picking: PcP and PKiKP cases

Congcong Yuan, Jie Zhang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The availability of a tremendous amount of seismic data demands seismological researchers to analyze seismic phases efficiently. Recently, deep learning algorithms exhibit a powerful capability of detecting and picking on P- and S-wave phases. However, it remains a challenge to effeciently process enormous teleseismic phases, which are crucial to probe Earth's interior structures and their dynamics. In this study, we propose a scheme to detect and pick teleseismic phases, such as seismic phase that reflects off the core-mantle boundary (i.e., PcP) and that reflects off the inner-core boundary (i.e., PKiKP), from a seismic dataset in Japan. The scheme consists of three steps: 1) latent phase traces are truncated from the whole seismogram with theoretical arrival times; 2) latent phases are recognized and evaluated by convolutional neural network (CNN) models; 3) arrivals of good or fair phase are picked with another CNN models. The testing detection result on 7386 seismograms shows that the scheme recognizes 92.15% and 94.13% of PcP and PKiKP phases. The testing picking result has a mean absolute error of 0.0742 s and 0.0636 s for the PcP and PKiKP phases, respectively. These seismograms were processed in just 5 min for phase detection and picking, demonstrating the efficiency of the proposed scheme in automatic teleseismic phase analysis. • A deep learning-based scheme is proposed for automated and efficient processing of teleseismic phases. • The validation with two teleseismic phases, PcP and PKiKP, demonstrate high detection accuracies and low picking errors. • Deep-learning picking of first peaks is more effective than picking first breaks of teleseismic phases.

Artificial Intelligence in GeosciencesVol. 6(1)
University of Science and Technology of China (CN), Planetary Science Institute (US), Harvard University (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
3.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Applying deep learning to teleseismic phase detection and picking: PcP and PKiKP cases — Congcong Yuan, Jie Zhang · Artificial Intelligence in Geosciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS