Turnover reasons are more complex than “people quit bosses”: An approach-avoidance perspective

The claim that people quit bosses is common on career websites and has even entered academic articles. From an approach-avoidance lens, the boss adage suggests that voluntary turnover is about escaping from somebody negative, which neglects potential approach-oriented reasons. We organize common turnover reasons within the motivational framework of approach and avoidance and explore whether and to what extent avoidance-oriented turnover reasons (among them boss issues) really outweigh approach-oriented ones. Leveraging different data sources—a systematic literature review, an online survey, and exit interviews—we also pursue a combinational approach and discuss findings from a measurement perspective. Overall, findings suggest that avoidance-related turnover reasons are somewhat more important than approach-oriented reasons. Stress (due to work overload) emerged as the most important avoidance-related reason, followed by boss issues. Yet, these two reasons were rarely employees' sole turnover reasons. Avoidance- and approach-oriented reasons often occurred in combination, and approach-related reasons such as the opportunity for advancement elsewhere were sometimes equally or even more important. Further, approach-oriented reasons related to advancement were more salient in exit interviews, and boss issues were more salient in employee online-reviews of their former employers. Altogether, we conclude that the boss adage is too much of a simplification of the complex reality of approach-and-avoidance-related turnover reasons. We further conclude that turnover reasons should be understood considering their assessment purpose and that it is meaningful to consider different combinations and types of leaving. Finally, we present ideas on how future research can utilize the approach-avoidance-perspective on turnover reasons. • Three studies explore employees' turnover reasons from an approach-avoidance lens. • Stress due to overload was pivotal; boss issues and advancement were also important. • Advancement was key in exit interviews, boss issues in online employer reviews. • Turnover reasons are more complex than “people quit bosses.” • Turnover reasons occur in combinations and vary based on assessment purpose.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vocational Behavior
Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2025.104099
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Turnover reasons are more complex than “people quit bosses”: An approach-avoidance perspective

Mark Stemmler, Ferdinand Keller, Sabine Hommelhoff
4 citations
Journal of Vocational Behavior
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
11.05
article

Turnover reasons are more complex than “people quit bosses”: An approach-avoidance perspective

Mark Stemmler, Ferdinand Keller, Sabine Hommelhoff
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The claim that people quit bosses is common on career websites and has even entered academic articles. From an approach-avoidance lens, the boss adage suggests that voluntary turnover is about escaping from somebody negative, which neglects potential approach-oriented reasons. We organize common turnover reasons within the motivational framework of approach and avoidance and explore whether and to what extent avoidance-oriented turnover reasons (among them boss issues) really outweigh approach-oriented ones. Leveraging different data sources—a systematic literature review, an online survey, and exit interviews—we also pursue a combinational approach and discuss findings from a measurement perspective. Overall, findings suggest that avoidance-related turnover reasons are somewhat more important than approach-oriented reasons. Stress (due to work overload) emerged as the most important avoidance-related reason, followed by boss issues. Yet, these two reasons were rarely employees' sole turnover reasons. Avoidance- and approach-oriented reasons often occurred in combination, and approach-related reasons such as the opportunity for advancement elsewhere were sometimes equally or even more important. Further, approach-oriented reasons related to advancement were more salient in exit interviews, and boss issues were more salient in employee online-reviews of their former employers. Altogether, we conclude that the boss adage is too much of a simplification of the complex reality of approach-and-avoidance-related turnover reasons. We further conclude that turnover reasons should be understood considering their assessment purpose and that it is meaningful to consider different combinations and types of leaving. Finally, we present ideas on how future research can utilize the approach-avoidance-perspective on turnover reasons. • Three studies explore employees' turnover reasons from an approach-avoidance lens. • Stress due to overload was pivotal; boss issues and advancement were also important. • Advancement was key in exit interviews, boss issues in online employer reviews. • Turnover reasons are more complex than “people quit bosses.” • Turnover reasons occur in combinations and vary based on assessment purpose.

Journal of Vocational BehaviorVol. 158
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE), University Hospital Ulm (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
11.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.