Frequency of Rh Antigen and Phenotypes in Voluntary Blood Donors

A BSTRACT Context: Rh blood group antigens are highly immunogenic and have a propensity to produce alloantibodies in multi-transfused patients. Knowledge of antigen frequency in a population is useful in compatibility issues, population genetics studies, and resolving medico-legal issues. Aims: To determine the frequency of Rh antigens in voluntary blood donors. Settings and Design: A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted on 381 voluntary blood donors in the blood center of a tertiary care center. Methods and Materials: Rh-D typing was conducted by the conventional tube method. Specific monoclonal antisera were used to detect major Rh antigens by the conventional tube method. Statistical Analysis Used: The collected data was recorded on an Excel spreadsheet and analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 20. The results are expressed in frequency and percentage. Results: Among Rh antigens, e was most common (96.6%), followed by D: 94%, C: 87.4%, c: 54.6%, and E: 17.3%. The most common phenotype in Rh-positive donors is DCe/DCe (R1R1) (43.6%), while in Rh-D-negative donors, it is dce/dce (rr) (4.5%). Rare phenotypes were encountered, among which were DCcEE and Rh E/e deletion. The Rh E/e negative antithetical antigens encountered were D CC− (0.5%) and DCc− (0.3%). Conclusions: The database for the antigen frequency of the Rh blood group system in the local blood donor population helps provide antigen-negative units to patients with multiple alloantibodies and compare the frequencies of Rh deletions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Journal of Dr D Y Patil Vidyapeeth
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/mjdrdypu.mjdrdypu_128_24
Primary Topic
Blood groups and transfusion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Frequency of Rh Antigen and Phenotypes in Voluntary Blood Donors

Chandrika Rao, S. Shruthi, A Srilekha
Medical Journal of Dr D Y Patil Vidyapeeth
Blood groups and transfusion
article

Frequency of Rh Antigen and Phenotypes in Voluntary Blood Donors

Chandrika Rao, S. Shruthi, A Srilekha
article en

Abstract

A BSTRACT Context: Rh blood group antigens are highly immunogenic and have a propensity to produce alloantibodies in multi-transfused patients. Knowledge of antigen frequency in a population is useful in compatibility issues, population genetics studies, and resolving medico-legal issues. Aims: To determine the frequency of Rh antigens in voluntary blood donors. Settings and Design: A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted on 381 voluntary blood donors in the blood center of a tertiary care center. Methods and Materials: Rh-D typing was conducted by the conventional tube method. Specific monoclonal antisera were used to detect major Rh antigens by the conventional tube method. Statistical Analysis Used: The collected data was recorded on an Excel spreadsheet and analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 20. The results are expressed in frequency and percentage. Results: Among Rh antigens, e was most common (96.6%), followed by D: 94%, C: 87.4%, c: 54.6%, and E: 17.3%. The most common phenotype in Rh-positive donors is DCe/DCe (R1R1) (43.6%), while in Rh-D-negative donors, it is dce/dce (rr) (4.5%). Rare phenotypes were encountered, among which were DCcEE and Rh E/e deletion. The Rh E/e negative antithetical antigens encountered were D CC− (0.5%) and DCc− (0.3%). Conclusions: The database for the antigen frequency of the Rh blood group system in the local blood donor population helps provide antigen-negative units to patients with multiple alloantibodies and compare the frequencies of Rh deletions.

Medical Journal of Dr D Y Patil VidyapeethVol. 17(Suppl 1)
K S Hegde Medical Academy (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Blood groups and transfusion
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.