Evaluating Generative AI: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directions

Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming industries by producing high-quality text, images, music, and code. Its applications extend to natural language processing, computer vision, and creative arts. However, assessing these systems' performance and impact remains challenging due to their complexity, subjectivity, and open-ended outputs. This paper comprehensively reviews evaluation methods for generative AI, beginning with its evolution and major applications, including advanced models like GPT, DALL·E, and AlphaCode. It categorizes evaluation approaches into quantitative metrics (such as BLEU and FID) and qualitative methods (human assessment and user-centered testing). Key challenges, such as subjectivity, bias, and scalability, are explored alongside emerging trends like automated evaluation tools, ethical impact assessments, and multimodal techniques. Through real-world case studies, this paper highlights practical evaluation strategies and their limitations. By integrating current best practices and identifying future research opportunities, this study aims to guide the development of reliable, fair, and comprehensive evaluation frameworks for generative AI systems.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i01.37182
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Generative AI: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directions

L. Ramamoorthy
1 citations
International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2.48
article

Evaluating Generative AI: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directions

L. Ramamoorthy
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming industries by producing high-quality text, images, music, and code. Its applications extend to natural language processing, computer vision, and creative arts. However, assessing these systems' performance and impact remains challenging due to their complexity, subjectivity, and open-ended outputs. This paper comprehensively reviews evaluation methods for generative AI, beginning with its evolution and major applications, including advanced models like GPT, DALL·E, and AlphaCode. It categorizes evaluation approaches into quantitative metrics (such as BLEU and FID) and qualitative methods (human assessment and user-centered testing). Key challenges, such as subjectivity, bias, and scalability, are explored alongside emerging trends like automated evaluation tools, ethical impact assessments, and multimodal techniques. Through real-world case studies, this paper highlights practical evaluation strategies and their limitations. By integrating current best practices and identifying future research opportunities, this study aims to guide the development of reliable, fair, and comprehensive evaluation frameworks for generative AI systems.

International Journal For Multidisciplinary ResearchVol. 7(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluating Generative AI: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directions — L. Ramamoorthy · International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS