Extraction and Characterisation of Chitin and Chitosan from waste Fish Scales

Fish scales were demineralized and deproteinized using 3% HCl and NaOH, respectively, to obtain chitin.The chitin was then deacetylated with 40% KOH to convert it to chitosan.Three samples were produced with yields as follows: Sample A (21.6% chitin, 11.5% chitosan), Sample B (32.55% chitin, 42.6% chitosan), and Sample C (35.7% chitin, 47% chitosan).The FTIR absorption regions for both chitin and chitosan were similar, differing only in shifts in absorbance wavelength.The degrees of deacetylation (DD) and viscosity average molecular weights of chitosan samples were determined as: A (35.56%, 41,340 g/mol), B (57.64%, 73,450 g/mol), and C (75%, 108,300 g/mol).XRD analysis indicated reduced crystallinity in chitosan samples B and C compared to sample A. SEM images revealed distinct morphologies between chitin and chitosan.Chitin sample B displayed rough, heterogeneous particles, whereas chitosan samples A, B, and C exhibited smooth, homogeneous surfaces influenced by purity, crystallinity, and the deacetylation process.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chemical Biological and Physical Sciences
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24214/jcbps.b.15.1.00715
Primary Topic
Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Extraction and Characterisation of Chitin and Chitosan from waste Fish Scales

Journal of Chemical Biological and Physical Sciences
Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
article

Extraction and Characterisation of Chitin and Chitosan from waste Fish Scales

article en

Abstract

Fish scales were demineralized and deproteinized using 3% HCl and NaOH, respectively, to obtain chitin.The chitin was then deacetylated with 40% KOH to convert it to chitosan.Three samples were produced with yields as follows: Sample A (21.6% chitin, 11.5% chitosan), Sample B (32.55% chitin, 42.6% chitosan), and Sample C (35.7% chitin, 47% chitosan).The FTIR absorption regions for both chitin and chitosan were similar, differing only in shifts in absorbance wavelength.The degrees of deacetylation (DD) and viscosity average molecular weights of chitosan samples were determined as: A (35.56%, 41,340 g/mol), B (57.64%, 73,450 g/mol), and C (75%, 108,300 g/mol).XRD analysis indicated reduced crystallinity in chitosan samples B and C compared to sample A. SEM images revealed distinct morphologies between chitin and chitosan.Chitin sample B displayed rough, heterogeneous particles, whereas chitosan samples A, B, and C exhibited smooth, homogeneous surfaces influenced by purity, crystallinity, and the deacetylation process.

Journal of Chemical Biological and Physical SciencesVol. 15(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Extraction and Characterisation of Chitin and Chitosan from waste Fish Scales · Journal of Chemical Biological and Physical Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS