Effects of Moral Reasoning and Team Identification on Sports Fans’ Psychological Health

When presented with troubling information about a player they root for, sports fans may engage in the coping strategies of rationalization and decoupling. This study explores how using those strategies affects fans’ social, eudaemonic, and hedonic psychological health when presented with an athlete having objectionable political associations and social media posts. A four (decoupling/coupling/rationalization/control) by three (low/medium/high team identification) experiment revealed that there were no differences in psychological health between moral-reasoning conditions or the control, suggesting that even if fans rationalize or decouple to cope, rooting for someone with objectionable political associations does not affect their well-being. However, team identification directly affected some measures of hedonic and eudaemonic well-being, but not social well-being. Implications for players, fans, teams, sport marketing, and media psychology are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Sport Communication
Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.2024-0228
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Psychosocial Factors Impacting Youth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Moral Reasoning and Team Identification on Sports Fans’ Psychological Health

Stephen M. Warren
1 citations
International Journal of Sport Communication
Psychosocial Factors Impacting Youth
4.20
article

Effects of Moral Reasoning and Team Identification on Sports Fans’ Psychological Health

Stephen M. Warren
article en
1 citations

Abstract

When presented with troubling information about a player they root for, sports fans may engage in the coping strategies of rationalization and decoupling. This study explores how using those strategies affects fans’ social, eudaemonic, and hedonic psychological health when presented with an athlete having objectionable political associations and social media posts. A four (decoupling/coupling/rationalization/control) by three (low/medium/high team identification) experiment revealed that there were no differences in psychological health between moral-reasoning conditions or the control, suggesting that even if fans rationalize or decouple to cope, rooting for someone with objectionable political associations does not affect their well-being. However, team identification directly affected some measures of hedonic and eudaemonic well-being, but not social well-being. Implications for players, fans, teams, sport marketing, and media psychology are discussed.

International Journal of Sport CommunicationVol. 18(3)
Northeastern University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Psychosocial Factors Impacting Youth
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Effects of Moral Reasoning and Team Identification on Sports Fans’ Psychological Health — Stephen M. Warren · International Journal of Sport Communication (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS