Understanding disability from a secondary data lens perspective: Evidence from consultations with members of the public with disabilities in the UK

Disability is a multifaceted phenomenon, which complicates data collection about people with disabilities in surveys and censuses. A central issue is that the multiple underlying theoretical models about disability are seldomly made explicit yet strongly determine how data are collected and analysed by governments and organisations. It is crucial that such models together with other information about disability and its measurement are accessible and understood by everyone. This study comprised several UK survey searches for disability or disability-related questions and a series of consultations with members of the public with lived experience of disability to understand their perceptions of theoretical models of disability in survey questions. The findings highlighted the importance of continued involvement of people with lived experience in technical research activities. They further revealed that members of the public with lived experience can effectively become familiar with theoretical models of disability and how to analyse them in relation to survey questions subject to careful preparation, including practical examples.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0318409
Primary Topic
Healthcare innovation and challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding disability from a secondary data lens perspective: Evidence from consultations with members of the public with disabilities in the UK

William Lammons, Sarah Markham, Eirini‐Christina Saloniki
PLoS ONE
Healthcare innovation and challenges
article

Understanding disability from a secondary data lens perspective: Evidence from consultations with members of the public with disabilities in the UK

William Lammons, Sarah Markham, Eirini‐Christina Saloniki
article en

Abstract

Disability is a multifaceted phenomenon, which complicates data collection about people with disabilities in surveys and censuses. A central issue is that the multiple underlying theoretical models about disability are seldomly made explicit yet strongly determine how data are collected and analysed by governments and organisations. It is crucial that such models together with other information about disability and its measurement are accessible and understood by everyone. This study comprised several UK survey searches for disability or disability-related questions and a series of consultations with members of the public with lived experience of disability to understand their perceptions of theoretical models of disability in survey questions. The findings highlighted the importance of continued involvement of people with lived experience in technical research activities. They further revealed that members of the public with lived experience can effectively become familiar with theoretical models of disability and how to analyse them in relation to survey questions subject to careful preparation, including practical examples.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(2)
King's College London (GB), University College London (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Healthcare innovation and challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Understanding disability from a secondary data lens perspective: Evidence from consultations with members of the public with disabilities in the UK — William Lammons, Sarah Markham, et al. · PLoS ONE (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS