Speech and Non-Speech Auditory Task Performance by Non-Native English Speakers

The results indicate that a number of English-based tests designed to assess auditory perception may be inappropriate for some Spanish-English bilingual adults. That is, some bilingual adults may perform worse than expected on tests that involve perceiving spoken English, in part because of linguistic differences, and not because of unusually poor auditory perception. The results also support the use of preliminary speech-in-noise screening tests in each of a bilingual patient's languages to establish if auditory perception tests in English are appropriate for a given individual. If a non-native English speaker's screening performance is worse in English than in the native language, one suggested strategy is to select auditory perceptual tests that are impacted minimally or not at all by linguistic differences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ear and Hearing
Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/aud.0000000000001648
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Speech and Non-Speech Auditory Task Performance by Non-Native English Speakers

Bridget McNamara, Ian Phillips, Rebecca E. Bieber, Alyssa Davidson et al.
1 citations
Ear and Hearing
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
1.43
article

Speech and Non-Speech Auditory Task Performance by Non-Native English Speakers

Bridget McNamara, Ian Phillips, Rebecca E. Bieber, Alyssa Davidson, Sandra Gordon‐Salant, Douglas S. Brungart
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The results indicate that a number of English-based tests designed to assess auditory perception may be inappropriate for some Spanish-English bilingual adults. That is, some bilingual adults may perform worse than expected on tests that involve perceiving spoken English, in part because of linguistic differences, and not because of unusually poor auditory perception. The results also support the use of preliminary speech-in-noise screening tests in each of a bilingual patient's languages to establish if auditory perception tests in English are appropriate for a given individual. If a non-native English speaker's screening performance is worse in English than in the native language, one suggested strategy is to select auditory perceptual tests that are impacted minimally or not at all by linguistic differences.

Ear and HearingVol. 46(4)
Walter Reed National Military Medical Center (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.