Increasingly Seasonal Jet Stream Raises Risk of Co‐Occurring Flooding and Extreme Wind in Great Britain

ABSTRACT Insurers and risk managers for critical infrastructure such as transport or power networks typically do not account for flooding and extreme winds happening at the same time in their quantitative risk assessments. We explore this potentially critical underestimation of risk from these co‐occurring hazards through studying events using the regional 12 km resolution UK Climate Projections for a 1981–1999 baseline and projections of 2061–2079 (RCP8.5). We create a new wintertime (October–March) set of 3427 wind events to match an existing set of fluvial flow extremes and design innovative multi‐event e pisodes (Δ t of 1–180 days long) that reflect how periods of adverse weather affect society (e.g., through damage). We show that the probability of co‐occurring wind‐flow episodes in Great Britain (GB) is underestimated 2–4 times if events are assumed independent. Significantly, this underestimation is greater both as severity increases and episode length reduces, highlighting the importance of considering risk from closely consecutive storms (Δ t ~ 3 days) and the most severe storms. In the future (2061–2079), joint wind‐flow extremes are twice as likely as during 1981–1999. Statistical modelling demonstrates that changes may significantly exceed thermodynamic expectations of higher river flows in a wetter future climate. The largest co‐occurrence increases happen in mid‐winter (DJF) with changes in the North Atlantic jet stream an important driver; we find the jet is strengthened and squeezed into a southward‐shifted latitude window (45°–50° N) giving typical future conditions that match instances of high flows and joint extremes impacting GB today. This strongly implies that the large‐scale driving conditions (e.g., jet stream state) for a multi‐impact ‘perfect storm’ will vary by country; understanding regional drivers of weather hazards over climate timescales is vital to inform risk mitigation and planning (e.g., diversification and mutual aid across Europe).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Climatology
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.8763
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Increasingly Seasonal Jet Stream Raises Risk of Co‐Occurring Flooding and Extreme Wind in Great Britain

Len Shaffrey, John K. Hillier, Paul Bates, Colin Manning et al.
1 citations
International Journal of Climatology
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
1.11
article

Increasingly Seasonal Jet Stream Raises Risk of Co‐Occurring Flooding and Extreme Wind in Great Britain

Len Shaffrey, John K. Hillier, Paul Bates, Colin Manning, Hannah Bloomfield, Freya Garry, Dhirendra Kumar
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Insurers and risk managers for critical infrastructure such as transport or power networks typically do not account for flooding and extreme winds happening at the same time in their quantitative risk assessments. We explore this potentially critical underestimation of risk from these co‐occurring hazards through studying events using the regional 12 km resolution UK Climate Projections for a 1981–1999 baseline and projections of 2061–2079 (RCP8.5). We create a new wintertime (October–March) set of 3427 wind events to match an existing set of fluvial flow extremes and design innovative multi‐event e pisodes (Δ t of 1–180 days long) that reflect how periods of adverse weather affect society (e.g., through damage). We show that the probability of co‐occurring wind‐flow episodes in Great Britain (GB) is underestimated 2–4 times if events are assumed independent. Significantly, this underestimation is greater both as severity increases and episode length reduces, highlighting the importance of considering risk from closely consecutive storms (Δ t ~ 3 days) and the most severe storms. In the future (2061–2079), joint wind‐flow extremes are twice as likely as during 1981–1999. Statistical modelling demonstrates that changes may significantly exceed thermodynamic expectations of higher river flows in a wetter future climate. The largest co‐occurrence increases happen in mid‐winter (DJF) with changes in the North Atlantic jet stream an important driver; we find the jet is strengthened and squeezed into a southward‐shifted latitude window (45°–50° N) giving typical future conditions that match instances of high flows and joint extremes impacting GB today. This strongly implies that the large‐scale driving conditions (e.g., jet stream state) for a multi‐impact ‘perfect storm’ will vary by country; understanding regional drivers of weather hazards over climate timescales is vital to inform risk mitigation and planning (e.g., diversification and mutual aid across Europe).

International Journal of ClimatologyVol. 45(5)
Met Office (GB), Loughborough University (GB), University of Bristol (GB), National Centre for Atmospheric Science (GB), University of Reading (GB), Newcastle University (GB)
UK Research and Innovation, Met Office, Arts and Humanities Research Council, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Economic and Social Research Council, Natural Environment Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.