Cabbage pest control with local inert dusts: do diatomaceous earth and wood ash have the highest potential?

Cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. alba) production in Europe faces challenges from insecticide resistance and environmental concerns. Inert dusts offer a promising alternative, but their field efficacy remains underexplored. Over two growing seasons, we conducted a three-block field investigation with seven treatments (zeolite, quartz sand, diatomaceous earth, wood ash, Ailanthus altissima dust, a positive control [Spinosad] and a negative control [untreated plants]) on a cabbage field. In the first, dry season, we found that diatomaceous earth and wood ash were most effective, reducing damage indices for Eurydema spp., flea beetles and lepidopteran larvae. A. altissima dust showed the best results against onion thrips. Diatomaceous earth also achieved the highest net and gross yield per cabbage head in the first growing season, significantly outperforming untreated control. The rainy, second growing season, reduced the efficacy of all inert dusts, with damage indices rising to 4 for all pest groups and net yields decreasing to ≈700 g per cabbage head. Although the positive control yielded higher, it still fell short of ideal levels. We found that diatomaceous earth and wood ash consistently outperformed other inert dust and the untreated control, with A. altissima dust being most effective against onion thrips.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B - Soil & Plant Science
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09064710.2025.2466448
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Insect Pest Control Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.75

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cabbage pest control with local inert dusts: do diatomaceous earth and wood ash have the highest potential?

Stanislav Trdan, Iztok Jože Košir, Urban Šilc, Aleksander Horvat et al.
1 citations
Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B - Soil & Plant Science
Insect Pest Control Strategies
1.75
article

Cabbage pest control with local inert dusts: do diatomaceous earth and wood ash have the highest potential?

Stanislav Trdan, Iztok Jože Košir, Urban Šilc, Aleksander Horvat, Tanja Bohinc, Monica Novljan, Luka Batistič, Eva Indihar
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. alba) production in Europe faces challenges from insecticide resistance and environmental concerns. Inert dusts offer a promising alternative, but their field efficacy remains underexplored. Over two growing seasons, we conducted a three-block field investigation with seven treatments (zeolite, quartz sand, diatomaceous earth, wood ash, Ailanthus altissima dust, a positive control [Spinosad] and a negative control [untreated plants]) on a cabbage field. In the first, dry season, we found that diatomaceous earth and wood ash were most effective, reducing damage indices for Eurydema spp., flea beetles and lepidopteran larvae. A. altissima dust showed the best results against onion thrips. Diatomaceous earth also achieved the highest net and gross yield per cabbage head in the first growing season, significantly outperforming untreated control. The rainy, second growing season, reduced the efficacy of all inert dusts, with damage indices rising to 4 for all pest groups and net yields decreasing to ≈700 g per cabbage head. Although the positive control yielded higher, it still fell short of ideal levels. We found that diatomaceous earth and wood ash consistently outperformed other inert dust and the untreated control, with A. altissima dust being most effective against onion thrips.

Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B - Soil & Plant ScienceVol. 75(1)
University of Ljubljana (SI), Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts (SI), National Research Institute of Brewing (JP)
Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Insect Pest Control Strategies
1.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.