Storytelling in the Australian 2023 voice referendum campaign

Personal stories are a strategic tool often used by advocacy movements to pursue claims for equality. In the 2023 Voice referendum campaign in Australia, personal storytelling was used by the conservative No campaign to argue against the constitutional recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. Through narrative analysis of the Yes and No campaigns, we highlight two storytelling dynamics. First, the autobiographical hero narrative, fused with the Australian ‘fair go’, to de-historicise inequality and de-emphasise experiences of colonisation and systemic racism. Second, personal storytelling’s strength in emphasising shared identity between storytellers and the public helped the No campaign’s defence of the status quo and their claims that constitutional recognition would be divisive. These narratives set the agenda for the campaign, making it difficult for the Yes campaign’s use of community strengths-based stories to convince the public that recognition of difference was key to achieving greater equality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The British Journal of Politics and International Relations
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13691481251317884
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Rhetoric and Communication Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
34.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Storytelling in the Australian 2023 voice referendum campaign

Ariadne Vromen, Serrin Rutledge‐Prior, Michael Vaughan
2 citations
The British Journal of Politics and International Relations
Rhetoric and Communication Studies
34.53
article

Storytelling in the Australian 2023 voice referendum campaign

Ariadne Vromen, Serrin Rutledge‐Prior, Michael Vaughan
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Personal stories are a strategic tool often used by advocacy movements to pursue claims for equality. In the 2023 Voice referendum campaign in Australia, personal storytelling was used by the conservative No campaign to argue against the constitutional recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. Through narrative analysis of the Yes and No campaigns, we highlight two storytelling dynamics. First, the autobiographical hero narrative, fused with the Australian ‘fair go’, to de-historicise inequality and de-emphasise experiences of colonisation and systemic racism. Second, personal storytelling’s strength in emphasising shared identity between storytellers and the public helped the No campaign’s defence of the status quo and their claims that constitutional recognition would be divisive. These narratives set the agenda for the campaign, making it difficult for the Yes campaign’s use of community strengths-based stories to convince the public that recognition of difference was key to achieving greater equality.

The British Journal of Politics and International RelationsVol. 28(1)
Australian National University (AU), Queen's University (CA), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Rhetoric and Communication Studies
34.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Storytelling in the Australian 2023 voice referendum campaign — Ariadne Vromen, Serrin Rutledge‐Prior, et al. · The British Journal of Politics and International Relations (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS