Verification of the Lactate Dehydrogenase dosage method using Abbott Architect ci8200 experience of the biochemistry laboratory, CHU Mohammed VI Oujda, Morocco

Introduction: This work describes the verification procedure to evaluate the analytical performance of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) assay, a key enzyme in glycolysis. It catalyzes the reversible conversion of pyruvate to lactate, with simultaneous production of NADH from NAD⁺. This evaluation forms part of a comprehensive process to validate the methods used in the central laboratory of the Mohammed VI University Hospital in Oujda, with the objective of assembling an accreditation file that meets the NF ISO 15189 standard requirements. Objectives: The aim of this study was to validate the analytical method for lactate dehydrogenase determination by evaluating key criteria such as repeatability and reproducibility. This validation process sought to ensure that the method complies with the required standards and delivers reliable and accurate results for clinical diagnostics. Results and Discussion: The verification of the LDH assay criteria demonstrated satisfactory repeatability across all three levels, with CV1=1.34%, CV2=0.71% and CV3=0.60% respectively. Similarly, intra-laboratory reproducibility was deemed satisfactory for all levels, with CV1 = 3.06%, CV2 = 2.50%, and CV3 = 1.77% for the respective levels. The verification of an analytical method is a critical step in ensuring that the obtained results closely align with the reference values of the sample. A comparison of our findings with the CV standards set by the SFBC (a quality control system) and RICOS (an international quality control network) indicates that our results comply with, and remain below, the acceptable limits. Conclusion: By implementing rigorous analytical performance verification, laboratories guarantee reliable clinical outcomes. This study enhances the existing knowledge base regarding the accuracy and reliability of serum LDH measurements.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences
Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30574/wjbphs.2025.21.2.0177
Primary Topic
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Verification of the Lactate Dehydrogenase dosage method using Abbott Architect ci8200 experience of the biochemistry laboratory, CHU Mohammed VI Oujda, Morocco

Dounia El Moujtahide, Karim Jamal, Mohammed Choukri, El Houcine Sebbar et al.
World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
article

Verification of the Lactate Dehydrogenase dosage method using Abbott Architect ci8200 experience of the biochemistry laboratory, CHU Mohammed VI Oujda, Morocco

Dounia El Moujtahide, Karim Jamal, Mohammed Choukri, El Houcine Sebbar, Imane Douichi, Meryem El Halas, Sara Moulay Rchid, Mohamed Karim El Azzouzi
article en

Abstract

Introduction: This work describes the verification procedure to evaluate the analytical performance of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) assay, a key enzyme in glycolysis. It catalyzes the reversible conversion of pyruvate to lactate, with simultaneous production of NADH from NAD⁺. This evaluation forms part of a comprehensive process to validate the methods used in the central laboratory of the Mohammed VI University Hospital in Oujda, with the objective of assembling an accreditation file that meets the NF ISO 15189 standard requirements. Objectives: The aim of this study was to validate the analytical method for lactate dehydrogenase determination by evaluating key criteria such as repeatability and reproducibility. This validation process sought to ensure that the method complies with the required standards and delivers reliable and accurate results for clinical diagnostics. Results and Discussion: The verification of the LDH assay criteria demonstrated satisfactory repeatability across all three levels, with CV1=1.34%, CV2=0.71% and CV3=0.60% respectively. Similarly, intra-laboratory reproducibility was deemed satisfactory for all levels, with CV1 = 3.06%, CV2 = 2.50%, and CV3 = 1.77% for the respective levels. The verification of an analytical method is a critical step in ensuring that the obtained results closely align with the reference values of the sample. A comparison of our findings with the CV standards set by the SFBC (a quality control system) and RICOS (an international quality control network) indicates that our results comply with, and remain below, the acceptable limits. Conclusion: By implementing rigorous analytical performance verification, laboratories guarantee reliable clinical outcomes. This study enhances the existing knowledge base regarding the accuracy and reliability of serum LDH measurements.

World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health SciencesVol. 21(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.