Effects of immune related adverse events and corticosteroids on the outcome of patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Immune related adverse events (irAEs) occur due to the inflammatory side effects of immune check point inhibitors (ICIs) and irAEs have been associated with improved efficacy in advanced non-small lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Corticosteroids can reduce the efficacy of ICIs due to their immunosuppressive effects. In this study, we aimed to show the effects of the development of irAEs and the use of ≥ 10 mg prednisone and equivalent steroids on treatment response. We analyzed the outcomes of patients with NSCLC treated with ICIs as monotherapy or ICIs in combination with chemotherapy (ChT) at a single academic center based on the presence of irAEs and the use of corticosteroids. A landmark analysis was performed due to the time-dependent nature of irAEs. 90 patients were included in the study. irAEs were seen in a total of 45 (50%) patients. In the landmark analysis, the median overall survival (OS) was 52.1 months in those who developed irAEs and 14.4 months in those who did not (HR 2.71, 95% CI (1.55-4.73), p < 0.001), and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was also higher in the patients with irAEs (25.9 vs. 8.4 months, HR 2.54, 95% CI (1.52-4.25), p < 0.001). The objective response rate (ORR) was significantly higher in patients experiencing irAEs than without irAEs: 60% versus 33.3%, respectively (p = 0.011). The number of patients using steroids was 22 (24%), while 68 patients (76%) were not using steroids. There was no significant difference in mOS: 26.5 versus 28.7 months (HR 1.14, 95% CI (0.63-2.08), p = 0.652) and mPFS: 16.9 versus 13.5 months (HR 0.99, 95% CI (0.57-1.74), p = 0.997) between patients who used steroids and those who did not. ICIs efficacy is higher in patients who developed irAEs. In our analyses, the grade of irAEs or the number of irAEs occurring in the individual had no effect on mOS and mPFS. In our patient group, steroid use was mostly related with irAEs, and we did not detect any negative effects of corticosteroid use on PFS and OS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-91102-z
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.18
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of immune related adverse events and corticosteroids on the outcome of patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Ezgi Değerli, Şahin Bedir, Mustafa Özgüroğlu, G. Sen et al.
4 citations
Scientific Reports
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
4.18
article

Effects of immune related adverse events and corticosteroids on the outcome of patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Ezgi Değerli, Şahin Bedir, Mustafa Özgüroğlu, G. Sen, Murad Guliyev, Shamkhal Safarov, Günay Can, Nihan Şentürk Öztaş, Hande Turna
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Immune related adverse events (irAEs) occur due to the inflammatory side effects of immune check point inhibitors (ICIs) and irAEs have been associated with improved efficacy in advanced non-small lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Corticosteroids can reduce the efficacy of ICIs due to their immunosuppressive effects. In this study, we aimed to show the effects of the development of irAEs and the use of ≥ 10 mg prednisone and equivalent steroids on treatment response. We analyzed the outcomes of patients with NSCLC treated with ICIs as monotherapy or ICIs in combination with chemotherapy (ChT) at a single academic center based on the presence of irAEs and the use of corticosteroids. A landmark analysis was performed due to the time-dependent nature of irAEs. 90 patients were included in the study. irAEs were seen in a total of 45 (50%) patients. In the landmark analysis, the median overall survival (OS) was 52.1 months in those who developed irAEs and 14.4 months in those who did not (HR 2.71, 95% CI (1.55-4.73), p < 0.001), and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was also higher in the patients with irAEs (25.9 vs. 8.4 months, HR 2.54, 95% CI (1.52-4.25), p < 0.001). The objective response rate (ORR) was significantly higher in patients experiencing irAEs than without irAEs: 60% versus 33.3%, respectively (p = 0.011). The number of patients using steroids was 22 (24%), while 68 patients (76%) were not using steroids. There was no significant difference in mOS: 26.5 versus 28.7 months (HR 1.14, 95% CI (0.63-2.08), p = 0.652) and mPFS: 16.9 versus 13.5 months (HR 0.99, 95% CI (0.57-1.74), p = 0.997) between patients who used steroids and those who did not. ICIs efficacy is higher in patients who developed irAEs. In our analyses, the grade of irAEs or the number of irAEs occurring in the individual had no effect on mOS and mPFS. In our patient group, steroid use was mostly related with irAEs, and we did not detect any negative effects of corticosteroid use on PFS and OS.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
4.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.