A corpus-based behavioral profile analysis of polysemy and antonymy: the case of the ancient Greek size adjectives <i>mikrós</i> and <i>mégas</i>

Abstract This article explores the semantic relationships between the antonymous adjectives mikrós (‘small’/‘little’) and mégas (‘big’/‘large’) in Classical Greek. Adopting a cognitive and usage-based perspective, the study applies the Behavioral Profile approach to investigate the polysemy of these adjectives and to assess the strength of their antonymic relationship. Specifically, it aims to determine whether the functional similarity among antonymous words is greater or lesser than that found within the senses of polysemous words. By focusing on how antonymous senses of different lexemes cluster together in a joint network, the study examines the extent to which antonymy, rather than polysemy, governs the organization of these senses. The analysis points to an upgraded role of antonymy in semantic structure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Folia Linguistica
Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2024-0028
Citations
1
Primary Topic
linguistics and terminology studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A corpus-based behavioral profile analysis of polysemy and antonymy: the case of the ancient Greek size adjectives mikrós and mégas

Thanasis Georgakopoulos, Marialena Lavda
1 citations
Folia Linguistica
linguistics and terminology studies
10.42
article

A corpus-based behavioral profile analysis of polysemy and antonymy: the case of the ancient Greek size adjectives mikrós and mégas

Thanasis Georgakopoulos, Marialena Lavda
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This article explores the semantic relationships between the antonymous adjectives mikrós (‘small’/‘little’) and mégas (‘big’/‘large’) in Classical Greek. Adopting a cognitive and usage-based perspective, the study applies the Behavioral Profile approach to investigate the polysemy of these adjectives and to assess the strength of their antonymic relationship. Specifically, it aims to determine whether the functional similarity among antonymous words is greater or lesser than that found within the senses of polysemous words. By focusing on how antonymous senses of different lexemes cluster together in a joint network, the study examines the extent to which antonymy, rather than polysemy, governs the organization of these senses. The analysis points to an upgraded role of antonymy in semantic structure.

Folia LinguisticaVol. 59(3)
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
linguistics and terminology studies
10.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A corpus-based behavioral profile analysis of polysemy and antonymy: the case of the ancient Greek size adjectives <i>mikrós</i> and <i>mégas</i> — Thanasis Georgakopoulos, Marialena Lavda · Folia Linguistica (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS