Does Intercropping improve soil aggregation and organic carbon protection? A case-study in the Semi-Arid Mediterranean

Intercropping has been claimed to improve the soil structure and soil quality, however its effects on soil fertility parameters in semi-arid Mediterranean agroecosystems remain unclear. The objective of this study was to assess whether intercropping and its combination with N fertilisation are adequate practices to improve the soil aggregate stability and organic matter quality. An irrigated on-farm experiment was established in northeastern Spain to evaluate the effect of seven cropping systems (faba bean-durum wheat, pea-durum wheat, and rapeseed-pea intercropping and the respective sole crops) and two N-fertiliser rates (0 vs. 75 kg N ha −1 ). Several soil variables were analysed in bulk soil: water-stable macro- and microaggregates, soil organic carbon (SOC), soil total nitrogen (STN), reduced permanganate (Per red ), particulate organic matter (POM) and carbon (POC), mineral-associated organic matter (MAOM) and carbon (MAOC) and microbial biomass carbon (MBC) and nitrogen (MBN). Also, SOC, Per red and nitrogen (N) storage within aggregates were determined. Intercropping did not increase the share of water-stable aggregates nor SOC levels, but SOC concentration was higher in macro- (2.34 g C 100 g −1 ) than in microaggregates (1.89 g 100 g −1 ). Intercropping did also not affect STN, but the mineral N-fertilised treatment increased both SOC (2.24 vs. 2.08 g 100 g −1 ) and STN (0.193 vs 0.177 g 100 g −1 ) significantly in bulk soil. This study showed that after a few years upon establishment, intercropping had not enhanced the soil aggregate stability significantly and as a sole practice intercropping does not improve soil C and N concentrations nor their active fractions. • Intercropping effects on soil fertility were measured in an on-farm experiment. • No increase of soil organic carbon under intercropping but overall highest concentrations in macroaggregates. • Higher nitrogen-levels and microbial biomass went along with formation of MAOM and reduced permanganate. • Nitrogen fertiliser improved soil organic carbon due to microbial alteration. • Soil total nitrogen binds to silt and clay surfaces outside of aggregates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment
Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2025.109563
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.32

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does Intercropping improve soil aggregation and organic carbon protection? A case-study in the Semi-Arid Mediterranean

Genís Simon‐Miquel, Jorge Lampurlanés, Louise Blanc, Daniel Plaza‐Bonilla et al.
7 citations
Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
13.32
article

Does Intercropping improve soil aggregation and organic carbon protection? A case-study in the Semi-Arid Mediterranean

Genís Simon‐Miquel, Jorge Lampurlanés, Louise Blanc, Daniel Plaza‐Bonilla, Marie Reichmann
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Intercropping has been claimed to improve the soil structure and soil quality, however its effects on soil fertility parameters in semi-arid Mediterranean agroecosystems remain unclear. The objective of this study was to assess whether intercropping and its combination with N fertilisation are adequate practices to improve the soil aggregate stability and organic matter quality. An irrigated on-farm experiment was established in northeastern Spain to evaluate the effect of seven cropping systems (faba bean-durum wheat, pea-durum wheat, and rapeseed-pea intercropping and the respective sole crops) and two N-fertiliser rates (0 vs. 75 kg N ha −1 ). Several soil variables were analysed in bulk soil: water-stable macro- and microaggregates, soil organic carbon (SOC), soil total nitrogen (STN), reduced permanganate (Per red ), particulate organic matter (POM) and carbon (POC), mineral-associated organic matter (MAOM) and carbon (MAOC) and microbial biomass carbon (MBC) and nitrogen (MBN). Also, SOC, Per red and nitrogen (N) storage within aggregates were determined. Intercropping did not increase the share of water-stable aggregates nor SOC levels, but SOC concentration was higher in macro- (2.34 g C 100 g −1 ) than in microaggregates (1.89 g 100 g −1 ). Intercropping did also not affect STN, but the mineral N-fertilised treatment increased both SOC (2.24 vs. 2.08 g 100 g −1 ) and STN (0.193 vs 0.177 g 100 g −1 ) significantly in bulk soil. This study showed that after a few years upon establishment, intercropping had not enhanced the soil aggregate stability significantly and as a sole practice intercropping does not improve soil C and N concentrations nor their active fractions. • Intercropping effects on soil fertility were measured in an on-farm experiment. • No increase of soil organic carbon under intercropping but overall highest concentrations in macroaggregates. • Higher nitrogen-levels and microbial biomass went along with formation of MAOM and reduced permanganate. • Nitrogen fertiliser improved soil organic carbon due to microbial alteration. • Soil total nitrogen binds to silt and clay surfaces outside of aggregates.

Agriculture Ecosystems & EnvironmentVol. 385
Universitat de Lleida (ES), Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (DE), BOKU University (AT)
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Agencia Estatal de Investigación, European Social Fund
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
13.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.