Assessing the rigidity of thermoplastic masks for head immobilization effectiveness in stereotactic radiosurgery
This study compared three Brainlab thermoplastic masks-Cranial 4pi basic, stereotactic (Close Mask V2), and open-face-to see how well they limited head movement during Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS). Using a head phantom, we tested rotational movements (pitch, yaw, and roll) and measured displacements with the ExacTrac system. The open-face mask had the smallest mean displacements (pitch: 0.14 ± 0.03°, yaw: 0.11 ± 0.02°, roll: 0.16 ± 0.03°) and performed slightly better than the stereotactic mask in pitch (0.20 ± 0.04°, p = 0.0173). The stereotactic mask performed similarly in yaw (0.09 ± 0.02°) and roll (0.16 ± 0.04°). The basic mask showed much more movement (pitch: 0.44 ± 0.13°, yaw: 0.28 ± 0.07°, roll: 0.26 ± 0.07°), making it less suitable for SRS. These results apply to the solid two-piece masks tested here and show that both the open-face and stereotactic masks provide reliable immobilization for accurate SRS treatments.
Authors
- Adam Agnew (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9431-2851)
- Daniel Foley (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1231-9671)
- Iris Pasion Apale
Institutions
- University College Dublin (IE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
- Published
- 2025-02-20
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70058
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Meningioma and schwannoma management
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.71