Assessing the rigidity of thermoplastic masks for head immobilization effectiveness in stereotactic radiosurgery

This study compared three Brainlab thermoplastic masks-Cranial 4pi basic, stereotactic (Close Mask V2), and open-face-to see how well they limited head movement during Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS). Using a head phantom, we tested rotational movements (pitch, yaw, and roll) and measured displacements with the ExacTrac system. The open-face mask had the smallest mean displacements (pitch: 0.14 ± 0.03°, yaw: 0.11 ± 0.02°, roll: 0.16 ± 0.03°) and performed slightly better than the stereotactic mask in pitch (0.20 ± 0.04°, p = 0.0173). The stereotactic mask performed similarly in yaw (0.09 ± 0.02°) and roll (0.16 ± 0.04°). The basic mask showed much more movement (pitch: 0.44 ± 0.13°, yaw: 0.28 ± 0.07°, roll: 0.26 ± 0.07°), making it less suitable for SRS. These results apply to the solid two-piece masks tested here and show that both the open-face and stereotactic masks provide reliable immobilization for accurate SRS treatments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70058
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Meningioma and schwannoma management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the rigidity of thermoplastic masks for head immobilization effectiveness in stereotactic radiosurgery

Adam Agnew, Daniel Foley, Iris Pasion Apale
2 citations
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
Meningioma and schwannoma management
2.71
article

Assessing the rigidity of thermoplastic masks for head immobilization effectiveness in stereotactic radiosurgery

Adam Agnew, Daniel Foley, Iris Pasion Apale
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study compared three Brainlab thermoplastic masks-Cranial 4pi basic, stereotactic (Close Mask V2), and open-face-to see how well they limited head movement during Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS). Using a head phantom, we tested rotational movements (pitch, yaw, and roll) and measured displacements with the ExacTrac system. The open-face mask had the smallest mean displacements (pitch: 0.14 ± 0.03°, yaw: 0.11 ± 0.02°, roll: 0.16 ± 0.03°) and performed slightly better than the stereotactic mask in pitch (0.20 ± 0.04°, p = 0.0173). The stereotactic mask performed similarly in yaw (0.09 ± 0.02°) and roll (0.16 ± 0.04°). The basic mask showed much more movement (pitch: 0.44 ± 0.13°, yaw: 0.28 ± 0.07°, roll: 0.26 ± 0.07°), making it less suitable for SRS. These results apply to the solid two-piece masks tested here and show that both the open-face and stereotactic masks provide reliable immobilization for accurate SRS treatments.

Journal of Applied Clinical Medical PhysicsVol. 26(5)
University College Dublin (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Meningioma and schwannoma management
2.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.