Adsorption of rare earth elements and aluminum on the surface of kaolinite: insights from sequential chemical extractions, XAFS, and DFT

Abstract To achieve selective leaching of ion adsorption rare earth, it is necessary to thoroughly reveal the differences in the adsorption mechanisms of aluminum and rare earth elements. In this study, we investigated the adsorption processes of Dy and Al on the surface of K–homoionic kaolinite using batch experiments and sequential chemical extractions. The results revealed that the adsorption of Dy and Al, as well as the desorption of K, followed the Langmuir model. The maximum ion‐exchangeable capacity of Dy was higher (9.39 mmol·kg −1 ) than that of Al (6.30 mmol·kg −1 ). The ion exchange stoichiometry ratios of Dy–K and Al–K derived from the Langmuir model were 2.0 and 2.6. The analysis of X‐ray absorption fine structure (XAFS) and density functional theory (DFT) revealed that Dy and Al were adsorbed onto kaolinite as outer‐sphere hydrated complexes via hydrogen bonds. Dy was adsorbed as [Dy(H 2 O) 10 ] 3+ , and Al was adsorbed as [Al(OH) 2 (H 2 O) 4 ] + . In particular, the adsorption of Al resulted in protonation of the hydroxyl groups on the surface of the kaolinite. Based on the above insights, the higher ion exchange stoichiometry ratios are attributed to closer adsorption distances (6.04 Å for Dy and 3.69 Å for Al) and lower adsorption energies (− 223.72 kJ·mol −1 for Dy and − 268.33 kJ·mol −1 for Al). The maximum ion‐exchangeable capacity is related to the change of the surface electrical properties of kaolinite. The zeta potential was increased to − 7.3 mV as the protonation resulted from aluminum adsorption, while Dy adsorption had a minor effect, maintaining a value of − 17.5 mV.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Rare Metals
Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12598-024-03141-6
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Extraction and Separation Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adsorption of rare earth elements and aluminum on the surface of kaolinite: insights from sequential chemical extractions, XAFS, and DFT

Shengxi Huang, Jiaxin Pan, Zongyu Feng, Depeng Liu et al.
8 citations
Rare Metals
Extraction and Separation Processes
5.71
article

Adsorption of rare earth elements and aluminum on the surface of kaolinite: insights from sequential chemical extractions, XAFS, and DFT

Shengxi Huang, Jiaxin Pan, Zongyu Feng, Depeng Liu, Jun Chen, Zheng Li, Longsheng Zhao
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Abstract To achieve selective leaching of ion adsorption rare earth, it is necessary to thoroughly reveal the differences in the adsorption mechanisms of aluminum and rare earth elements. In this study, we investigated the adsorption processes of Dy and Al on the surface of K–homoionic kaolinite using batch experiments and sequential chemical extractions. The results revealed that the adsorption of Dy and Al, as well as the desorption of K, followed the Langmuir model. The maximum ion‐exchangeable capacity of Dy was higher (9.39 mmol·kg −1 ) than that of Al (6.30 mmol·kg −1 ). The ion exchange stoichiometry ratios of Dy–K and Al–K derived from the Langmuir model were 2.0 and 2.6. The analysis of X‐ray absorption fine structure (XAFS) and density functional theory (DFT) revealed that Dy and Al were adsorbed onto kaolinite as outer‐sphere hydrated complexes via hydrogen bonds. Dy was adsorbed as [Dy(H 2 O) 10 ] 3+ , and Al was adsorbed as [Al(OH) 2 (H 2 O) 4 ] + . In particular, the adsorption of Al resulted in protonation of the hydroxyl groups on the surface of the kaolinite. Based on the above insights, the higher ion exchange stoichiometry ratios are attributed to closer adsorption distances (6.04 Å for Dy and 3.69 Å for Al) and lower adsorption energies (− 223.72 kJ·mol −1 for Dy and − 268.33 kJ·mol −1 for Al). The maximum ion‐exchangeable capacity is related to the change of the surface electrical properties of kaolinite. The zeta potential was increased to − 7.3 mV as the protonation resulted from aluminum adsorption, while Dy adsorption had a minor effect, maintaining a value of − 17.5 mV.

Rare MetalsVol. 44(6)
General Research Institute for Nonferrous Metals (China) (CN), Grinm Advanced Materials (China) (CN), Western Metal Materials (China) (CN), University of Science and Technology Beijing (CN)
Beijing Nova Program
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Extraction and Separation Processes
5.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.