A Processing Algorithm to Address Real-World Data Quality Issues With Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data stored in data warehouses often include duplicated or time-shifted uploads from the same patient, compromising data quality and accuracy of resulting CGM metrics. We developed a processing algorithm to detect and resolve these errors. We validated the algorithm using two weeks of CGM data from 2038 patients with diabetes. Duplication errors were identified in 528 patients, with 25.7% showing significant differences in at least one metric (Time in Range, Coefficient of Variation, Glycemic Management Indicator, or Glycemic Episode counts) between raw and processed data. Eleven patients crossed clinically meaningful thresholds in one or more metrics after processing. Our results underscore the importance of real-world CGM data processing to maintain accurate and reliable CGM metrics for research and clinical care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/19322968251319801
Primary Topic
Diabetes Management and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Processing Algorithm to Address Real-World Data Quality Issues With Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data

Joyce M. Lee, W. WILLIAMSON, Irina Gaynanova
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Diabetes Management and Research
article

A Processing Algorithm to Address Real-World Data Quality Issues With Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data

Joyce M. Lee, W. WILLIAMSON, Irina Gaynanova
article en

Abstract

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data stored in data warehouses often include duplicated or time-shifted uploads from the same patient, compromising data quality and accuracy of resulting CGM metrics. We developed a processing algorithm to detect and resolve these errors. We validated the algorithm using two weeks of CGM data from 2038 patients with diabetes. Duplication errors were identified in 528 patients, with 25.7% showing significant differences in at least one metric (Time in Range, Coefficient of Variation, Glycemic Management Indicator, or Glycemic Episode counts) between raw and processed data. Eleven patients crossed clinically meaningful thresholds in one or more metrics after processing. Our results underscore the importance of real-world CGM data processing to maintain accurate and reliable CGM metrics for research and clinical care.

Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
University of Michigan (US)
Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Diabetes Management and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.