Mucosal washes are useful for sampling intestinal mucus-associated microbiota despite low biomass

Understanding the dynamic relationship between mucus-associated microbiota and host health is critical. However, studies predominantly using stool samples may not accurately represent these bacterial communities. Here, we investigated the mucus-associated microbiota in the gastrointestinal tract of mice and the terminal ileum of humans using different sample types: mucosal washes, brushes, scrapings, and intestinal contents in mice and biopsies, brushes and mucosal washes in humans. We used DNA quantification and 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing to evaluate the comparability of the information yielded from the different sample types under a controlled benchmark. In mice, mucosal washes and brushes had comparative bacterial DNA and host DNA contamination than scraping samples. Similarly, in humans, washes outperformed biopsies in bacterial DNA content. Read counts and microbiota alpha diversity remained remarkably similar in mice and between brushes and washes in humans. The composition of the microbiota varied based on the subsegment and sample type in mice and sample type in humans. We conclude that washes and brushes reduce host contamination without inducing substantial compositional bias when sampling mucosal microbiota. Our findings suggest that mucosal washes and brushes are a viable alternative to biopsies in humans and scrapings in mice, thereby improving the transferability of results across hosts. Our study highlights the importance of focusing on mucus-associated microbiota to better capture host-microbiome interactions at their closer interface.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Gut Microbes
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2025.2464296
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Gut microbiota and health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.81

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mucosal washes are useful for sampling intestinal mucus-associated microbiota despite low biomass

Catharina Kramer, Víctor Hugo Jarquín‐Díaz, Jennifer N. Martínez-Medina, J Ziegler et al.
1 citations
Gut Microbes
Gut microbiota and health
0.81
article

Mucosal washes are useful for sampling intestinal mucus-associated microbiota despite low biomass

Catharina Kramer, Víctor Hugo Jarquín‐Díaz, Jennifer N. Martínez-Medina, J Ziegler, Britta Siegmund, Sofia Kirke Forslund, Fereshteh Ghazisaeedi, Victoria McParland, Marcus Fulde, Paul W. Mönch
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Understanding the dynamic relationship between mucus-associated microbiota and host health is critical. However, studies predominantly using stool samples may not accurately represent these bacterial communities. Here, we investigated the mucus-associated microbiota in the gastrointestinal tract of mice and the terminal ileum of humans using different sample types: mucosal washes, brushes, scrapings, and intestinal contents in mice and biopsies, brushes and mucosal washes in humans. We used DNA quantification and 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing to evaluate the comparability of the information yielded from the different sample types under a controlled benchmark. In mice, mucosal washes and brushes had comparative bacterial DNA and host DNA contamination than scraping samples. Similarly, in humans, washes outperformed biopsies in bacterial DNA content. Read counts and microbiota alpha diversity remained remarkably similar in mice and between brushes and washes in humans. The composition of the microbiota varied based on the subsegment and sample type in mice and sample type in humans. We conclude that washes and brushes reduce host contamination without inducing substantial compositional bias when sampling mucosal microbiota. Our findings suggest that mucosal washes and brushes are a viable alternative to biopsies in humans and scrapings in mice, thereby improving the transferability of results across hosts. Our study highlights the importance of focusing on mucus-associated microbiota to better capture host-microbiome interactions at their closer interface.

Gut MicrobesVol. 17(1)
Max Delbrück Center (DE), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DE), European Molecular Biology Laboratory (DE), Center for Rheumatology (US), Freie Universität Berlin (DE), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Gut microbiota and health
0.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.