Corruption and Default Risk: Global Evidence

ABSTRACT The extant literature explores the consequences of corruption on firms’ growth and survival. However, its impact on default risk remains unexplored. On the basis of a sample of 189,109 firm‐years from 2004 to 2021 across 47 countries, our study reveals that a one standard deviation increase in corruption is associated with an 11.3% increase in default risk. Our channel analysis identifies information asymmetry and managerial risk‐taking as key mechanisms through which corruption influences default risk. This adverse effect is particularly pronounced in countries with opaque information environments, weak governance frameworks and inadequate external monitoring of firms. We further highlight the detrimental impact of corruption on firms’ borrowing costs and banks’ loan performance. Our study emphasizes the importance of enhancing information transparency and implementing stringent control mechanisms as a basis of mitigating corruption's detrimental effects across a range of different socio‐political contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Business Finance &amp Accounting
Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12860
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Corruption and Economic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Corruption and Default Risk: Global Evidence

Muhammad Atif, Geoffrey Wood, Vincent Tawiah, Jia Liu et al.
2 citations
Journal of Business Finance &amp Accounting
Corruption and Economic Development
8.40
article

Corruption and Default Risk: Global Evidence

Muhammad Atif, Geoffrey Wood, Vincent Tawiah, Jia Liu, Sivathaasan Nadarajah
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The extant literature explores the consequences of corruption on firms’ growth and survival. However, its impact on default risk remains unexplored. On the basis of a sample of 189,109 firm‐years from 2004 to 2021 across 47 countries, our study reveals that a one standard deviation increase in corruption is associated with an 11.3% increase in default risk. Our channel analysis identifies information asymmetry and managerial risk‐taking as key mechanisms through which corruption influences default risk. This adverse effect is particularly pronounced in countries with opaque information environments, weak governance frameworks and inadequate external monitoring of firms. We further highlight the detrimental impact of corruption on firms’ borrowing costs and banks’ loan performance. Our study emphasizes the importance of enhancing information transparency and implementing stringent control mechanisms as a basis of mitigating corruption's detrimental effects across a range of different socio‐political contexts.

Journal of Business Finance &amp AccountingVol. 52(3)
Griffith University (AU), Western University (CA), Dublin City University (IE), University of Bath (GB), University of Portsmouth (GB), Cranfield University (GB), RMIT University (AU)
RMIT University
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Corruption and Economic Development
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Corruption and Default Risk: Global Evidence — Muhammad Atif, Geoffrey Wood, et al. · Journal of Business Finance &amp Accounting (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS