Invited perspective on Research Ethics in Response to “The Right to Read Without Being Read: Research Ethics in the Study of Digital Reading Behaviour”

This invited perspective is a response to the position paper “The Right to Read Without Being Read: Research Ethics in the Study of Digital Reading Behaviour”. From the point of view of the researcher behind one of the case studies discussed in the position paper, this paper highlights three perspectives on research ethics: 1) the potential negative effects for individuals of studying book streaming data as in the project design are minimal, and ethics have been discussed continuously in the project; 2) the question whether this kind of data is to be considered sensitive data or not is not simple, and it is important to restrict this label to data that is indeed sensitive; and 3) questions concerning privacy evoked by this kind of reader data are recurrently addressed in the research by the author.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Privacy Studies Journal
Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7146/psj.v4i.153185
Primary Topic
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Invited perspective on Research Ethics in Response to “The Right to Read Without Being Read: Research Ethics in the Study of Digital Reading Behaviour”

Karl Berglund
1 links
Privacy Studies Journal
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
article

Invited perspective on Research Ethics in Response to “The Right to Read Without Being Read: Research Ethics in the Study of Digital Reading Behaviour”

Karl Berglund
article en

Abstract

This invited perspective is a response to the position paper “The Right to Read Without Being Read: Research Ethics in the Study of Digital Reading Behaviour”. From the point of view of the researcher behind one of the case studies discussed in the position paper, this paper highlights three perspectives on research ethics: 1) the potential negative effects for individuals of studying book streaming data as in the project design are minimal, and ethics have been discussed continuously in the project; 2) the question whether this kind of data is to be considered sensitive data or not is not simple, and it is important to restrict this label to data that is indeed sensitive; and 3) questions concerning privacy evoked by this kind of reader data are recurrently addressed in the research by the author.

Privacy Studies JournalVol. 4
Uppsala University (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Invited perspective on Research Ethics in Response to “The Right to Read Without Being Read: Research Ethics in the Study of Digital Reading Behaviour” — Karl Berglund · Privacy Studies Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS