Exploring the Inequality Under the Law

As modern society has gradually shifted its focus from materialism to cultural development, equality has always been a universal goal worldwide and an enduring topic provoking heat debate in the academic sphere. It is commonly accepted that the law acts as a leading and pioneering role in the practice of equality, whereas the author disapproves this statement and will evaluate its existing injustice from the angles of ethnicity and gender, extending from previous scholars' studies. This article covers three main sections: introduction, main body and conclusion. Firstly, it judges the phenomenon of ethnicity inequality in the law referencing to the economic position and racial discrimination. The opposing side's analysis of the current improvement and geographical consideration will be reasonably refuted to further support the author's viewpoint. Subsequently, the author analyzes the system of gender blindness exhibited in the judicial system to demonstrate its practice of gender inequality, proposing reference angles and methods for addressing it.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Education Humanities and Social Sciences
Published
2025-02-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54097/dm44m180
Primary Topic
Gender Diversity and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the Inequality Under the Law

Liwei Lin
Journal of Education Humanities and Social Sciences
Gender Diversity and Inequality
article

Exploring the Inequality Under the Law

Liwei Lin
article en

Abstract

As modern society has gradually shifted its focus from materialism to cultural development, equality has always been a universal goal worldwide and an enduring topic provoking heat debate in the academic sphere. It is commonly accepted that the law acts as a leading and pioneering role in the practice of equality, whereas the author disapproves this statement and will evaluate its existing injustice from the angles of ethnicity and gender, extending from previous scholars' studies. This article covers three main sections: introduction, main body and conclusion. Firstly, it judges the phenomenon of ethnicity inequality in the law referencing to the economic position and racial discrimination. The opposing side's analysis of the current improvement and geographical consideration will be reasonably refuted to further support the author's viewpoint. Subsequently, the author analyzes the system of gender blindness exhibited in the judicial system to demonstrate its practice of gender inequality, proposing reference angles and methods for addressing it.

Journal of Education Humanities and Social SciencesVol. 47
Suzhou Research Institute (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Gender Diversity and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.