The Case of Charles Taylor from the Perspective of Individual Criminal Responsibility in Crimes Against Humanity

Crimes against humanity are one of the most serious violations of international criminal law, including widespread and systematic acts against civilians, such as murder, sexual slavery and torture. The principle of individual criminal responsibility is applied to ensure that perpetrators, including leaders of a state, can be tried for their actions. The case of Charles Taylor, former President of Liberia, is an important study of how international criminal law prosecutes leaders of states who support crimes against humanity through ad hoc courts. This paper uses a juridical-normative method with a case approach. The results of the study show that the verdict on Charles Taylor confirms the principle that no individual, not even a head of state, is immune from the law. However, the enforcement of international criminal law requires increased cross-country cooperation, strengthening of international judicial institutions, and mechanisms to cut off the funding of armed conflicts, to ensure global justice and human rights protection are better protected.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Law Environment and Natural Resources
Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51749/injurlens.v4i2.107
Primary Topic
Educational Reforms and Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Case of Charles Taylor from the Perspective of Individual Criminal Responsibility in Crimes Against Humanity

Nur Aliya Rasyidah
International Journal of Law Environment and Natural Resources
Educational Reforms and Innovations
article

The Case of Charles Taylor from the Perspective of Individual Criminal Responsibility in Crimes Against Humanity

Nur Aliya Rasyidah
article en

Abstract

Crimes against humanity are one of the most serious violations of international criminal law, including widespread and systematic acts against civilians, such as murder, sexual slavery and torture. The principle of individual criminal responsibility is applied to ensure that perpetrators, including leaders of a state, can be tried for their actions. The case of Charles Taylor, former President of Liberia, is an important study of how international criminal law prosecutes leaders of states who support crimes against humanity through ad hoc courts. This paper uses a juridical-normative method with a case approach. The results of the study show that the verdict on Charles Taylor confirms the principle that no individual, not even a head of state, is immune from the law. However, the enforcement of international criminal law requires increased cross-country cooperation, strengthening of international judicial institutions, and mechanisms to cut off the funding of armed conflicts, to ensure global justice and human rights protection are better protected.

International Journal of Law Environment and Natural ResourcesVol. 4(2)
Lambung Mangkurat University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Educational Reforms and Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Case of Charles Taylor from the Perspective of Individual Criminal Responsibility in Crimes Against Humanity — Nur Aliya Rasyidah · International Journal of Law Environment and Natural Resources (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS