Cost Dynamics of Microfinance Institutions with Rural and Urban Loan Portfolios

This study investigates cost dynamics of Microfinance Institutions (MFIs) engaged in joint production of rural and urban loans. Employing a translog cost function, the paper examines economies of scale, cost complementarities, and elasticities of substitution using three MFI categories: those offering both deposits and loans (Dep-MFIs), those offering only loans (Non Dep-MFIs), and the aggregate sample. The analysis utilizes data from 2008 to 2015, sourced from over 1,000 MFIs worldwide. Results indicate increasing economies of scale for all MFI categories, with Dep-MFIs demonstrating the most significant cost reductions over time. Urban loans are generally more expensive to produce for Non-Dep-MFIs, while rural loans remain costlier for Dep-MFIs and the aggregate sample. Despite positive but minimal cost complementarities, approximately one-fifth of Dep-MFIs experience negative cost complementarities, suggesting potential learning effects. These findings contribute to the literature on financial inclusion by offering empirical insights into cost efficiencies and production dynamics within MFIs.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Research in Applied Economics
Published
2024-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5296/rae.v16i2.22667
Primary Topic
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost Dynamics of Microfinance Institutions with Rural and Urban Loan Portfolios

Valentina Hartarska, Charles Karau Machatha, Denis A. Nadolnyak
Research in Applied Economics
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
article

Cost Dynamics of Microfinance Institutions with Rural and Urban Loan Portfolios

Valentina Hartarska, Charles Karau Machatha, Denis A. Nadolnyak
article en

Abstract

This study investigates cost dynamics of Microfinance Institutions (MFIs) engaged in joint production of rural and urban loans. Employing a translog cost function, the paper examines economies of scale, cost complementarities, and elasticities of substitution using three MFI categories: those offering both deposits and loans (Dep-MFIs), those offering only loans (Non Dep-MFIs), and the aggregate sample. The analysis utilizes data from 2008 to 2015, sourced from over 1,000 MFIs worldwide. Results indicate increasing economies of scale for all MFI categories, with Dep-MFIs demonstrating the most significant cost reductions over time. Urban loans are generally more expensive to produce for Non-Dep-MFIs, while rural loans remain costlier for Dep-MFIs and the aggregate sample. Despite positive but minimal cost complementarities, approximately one-fifth of Dep-MFIs experience negative cost complementarities, suggesting potential learning effects. These findings contribute to the literature on financial inclusion by offering empirical insights into cost efficiencies and production dynamics within MFIs.

Research in Applied EconomicsVol. 16(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.