Hegemonic Media and Polarized Discourses: An Analysis of Disinformation Narratives in Indian Media

There is a growing concern that disinformation, particularly transmitted through mobile phones, television, and social media, is fuelling social tension and even violence at times. Ample evidence, along with anecdotal interpretations, is available to illustrate how digital and mainstream media platforms in India have turned into pernicious channels for spreading hatred and violence. The proposed study investigates how propaganda, disinformation and fake news are used as polarization tools to elevate a particular political ideology or practice in a democracy like India. The study highlights a series of events and hashtags used on X (earlier Twitter) and other social platforms using derogatory language or agendas against communities and people of dissent. The media is wielded as a tool to spread polarized discourses that serve the interest of the ruling dispensation. Using some examples of fake news and propaganda, this paper draws attention to media propaganda and its effects on minorities, Muslims in particular, and human intellect in general. The research looks at how political goals shape propaganda definitions and signs, symbols, or languages used against minorities, who are largely portrayed as ‘others’ in the country. Additionally, it delves into the strategies and techniques employed by prejudiced media to shape reality, as well as how they undermine cultural norms and promote divisive policies of the ruling regime. The investigation of specific texts, videos, and audios will support the study. The findings reveal that such propagandised media or sources of information can have both positive and negative effects on the democratic process. The study uses some cases as examples to show how disinformation or media manipulation restricts the freedom of expression, food habits, mobility, and affiliation of the country's minorities. This is troubling because stigma can lead to more hostile attitudes toward integration or weaken one's sense of belonging in democracies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of English Language
Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v15n4p144
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hegemonic Media and Polarized Discourses: An Analysis of Disinformation Narratives in Indian Media

Sohaib Alam, Sadaf Khalid, Farhan Ahmad, Khalid Amin et al.
World Journal of English Language
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Hegemonic Media and Polarized Discourses: An Analysis of Disinformation Narratives in Indian Media

Sohaib Alam, Sadaf Khalid, Farhan Ahmad, Khalid Amin, Wahaj Unnisa Warda, Anam Shams, Shafey Anwarul Haque
article en

Abstract

There is a growing concern that disinformation, particularly transmitted through mobile phones, television, and social media, is fuelling social tension and even violence at times. Ample evidence, along with anecdotal interpretations, is available to illustrate how digital and mainstream media platforms in India have turned into pernicious channels for spreading hatred and violence. The proposed study investigates how propaganda, disinformation and fake news are used as polarization tools to elevate a particular political ideology or practice in a democracy like India. The study highlights a series of events and hashtags used on X (earlier Twitter) and other social platforms using derogatory language or agendas against communities and people of dissent. The media is wielded as a tool to spread polarized discourses that serve the interest of the ruling dispensation. Using some examples of fake news and propaganda, this paper draws attention to media propaganda and its effects on minorities, Muslims in particular, and human intellect in general. The research looks at how political goals shape propaganda definitions and signs, symbols, or languages used against minorities, who are largely portrayed as ‘others’ in the country. Additionally, it delves into the strategies and techniques employed by prejudiced media to shape reality, as well as how they undermine cultural norms and promote divisive policies of the ruling regime. The investigation of specific texts, videos, and audios will support the study. The findings reveal that such propagandised media or sources of information can have both positive and negative effects on the democratic process. The study uses some cases as examples to show how disinformation or media manipulation restricts the freedom of expression, food habits, mobility, and affiliation of the country's minorities. This is troubling because stigma can lead to more hostile attitudes toward integration or weaken one's sense of belonging in democracies.

World Journal of English LanguageVol. 15(4)
Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University (SA), Integral University (IN), Noida International University (IN), University of Hafr Al-Batin (SA)
Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.