What should I know? Analysing behaviour and feedback from student use of a virtual assistant to share information about disabilities

Administrative burden is a recognised cause of inequities for disabled students. Experiences of sharing information about disabilities and arranging adjustments can be demoralising and present barriers to success. To explore how Artificial Intelligence technologies could improve this situation, a virtual assistant (VA) was iteratively developed and deployed to support the initial steps of the process through which students share information. Here we describe findings from an eight-month trial where this was made available for students to use as an alternative to completing a form when declaring disabilities. 544 students tried using the assistant during this period. We analyse 351 questions asked of the VA by students, and a feedback survey with 129 responses. Results indicate the types of support expected while interacting with a VA and provide feedback on aspects of the design, the relationship with wider processes and experience of use. Overall, most participants wanted to continue using a VA in these processes, with positive perceptions across disability categories. We identify 12 themes showing a broad range of questions asked of the assistant. Given recent advances in AI, we discuss the opportunities and challenges to build on this and develop further inclusive innovations. Future work should focus on enabling context-informed answers to questions, enabling students to learn and contribute through the conversation, managing expectations according to VA capabilities, enhancing and monitoring inclusivity and integrating the VA with wider processes. • Administrative processes create additional burden and poor experiences for disabled students. • A virtual assistant was co-designed and deployed in a trial as a way to shared information and learn about study. • Most wanted to use the assistant again and perceptions were positive across the categories of disabilities disclosed. • Students appreciated AI-powered features such as receiving personalised suggestions gathered from fellow students. • Advances in GenAI offer opportunities to address identified needs such as answering complex questions with multiple sources.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Internet and Higher Education
Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2025.101002
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
23.09

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What should I know? Analysing behaviour and feedback from student use of a virtual assistant to share information about disabilities

Tim Coughlan, Francisco Iniesto
4 citations
The Internet and Higher Education
Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
23.09
article

What should I know? Analysing behaviour and feedback from student use of a virtual assistant to share information about disabilities

Tim Coughlan, Francisco Iniesto
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Administrative burden is a recognised cause of inequities for disabled students. Experiences of sharing information about disabilities and arranging adjustments can be demoralising and present barriers to success. To explore how Artificial Intelligence technologies could improve this situation, a virtual assistant (VA) was iteratively developed and deployed to support the initial steps of the process through which students share information. Here we describe findings from an eight-month trial where this was made available for students to use as an alternative to completing a form when declaring disabilities. 544 students tried using the assistant during this period. We analyse 351 questions asked of the VA by students, and a feedback survey with 129 responses. Results indicate the types of support expected while interacting with a VA and provide feedback on aspects of the design, the relationship with wider processes and experience of use. Overall, most participants wanted to continue using a VA in these processes, with positive perceptions across disability categories. We identify 12 themes showing a broad range of questions asked of the assistant. Given recent advances in AI, we discuss the opportunities and challenges to build on this and develop further inclusive innovations. Future work should focus on enabling context-informed answers to questions, enabling students to learn and contribute through the conversation, managing expectations according to VA capabilities, enhancing and monitoring inclusivity and integrating the VA with wider processes. • Administrative processes create additional burden and poor experiences for disabled students. • A virtual assistant was co-designed and deployed in a trial as a way to shared information and learn about study. • Most wanted to use the assistant again and perceptions were positive across the categories of disabilities disclosed. • Students appreciated AI-powered features such as receiving personalised suggestions gathered from fellow students. • Advances in GenAI offer opportunities to address identified needs such as answering complex questions with multiple sources.

The Internet and Higher EducationVol. 66
Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (ES), The Open University (GB)
Microsoft, Open University
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
23.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.