Comparing the Effectiveness of Propensity Score-Matched Ab Interno Trabeculotomy Between Two Types of Trabecular Hooks

Surgical outcomes for ab interno trabeculotomy using the KDB and TMH were not significantly different. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of postoperative complications, except hyphema, which may reflect the difference in the incision range of trabeculotomy between the hooks. Finally, in the KDB group, where narrow incisions range up to just over one quadrant, the trabeculotomy incision range correlated with IOP.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical ophthalmology
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2147/opth.s498940
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Glaucoma and retinal disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.83

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing the Effectiveness of Propensity Score-Matched Ab Interno Trabeculotomy Between Two Types of Trabecular Hooks

Suguru Nakagawa, Yi‐Ning Chen, K. Totsuka, Kiyoshi Ishii et al.
4 citations
Clinical ophthalmology
Glaucoma and retinal disorders
6.83
article

Comparing the Effectiveness of Propensity Score-Matched Ab Interno Trabeculotomy Between Two Types of Trabecular Hooks

Suguru Nakagawa, Yi‐Ning Chen, K. Totsuka, Kiyoshi Ishii, Kimiko Okinaga, Mitsuko Takamoto
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Surgical outcomes for ab interno trabeculotomy using the KDB and TMH were not significantly different. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of postoperative complications, except hyphema, which may reflect the difference in the incision range of trabeculotomy between the hooks. Finally, in the KDB group, where narrow incisions range up to just over one quadrant, the trabeculotomy incision range correlated with IOP.

Clinical ophthalmologyVol. Volume 19
Saitama Red Cross Hospital (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Glaucoma and retinal disorders
6.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.