Validity and Reliability of the Posturographic Outcomes of a Portable Balance Board

In view of the frequent use of the portable balance board (Tymo<sup>®</sup>, Tyromotion, Graz, Austria) in neurorehabilitation, the objective of this study is to assess its posturographic validity and reliability in comparison to a floor-embedded force platform (AMTI, Watertown, MA, USA), as well as its clinical validity in stroke patients. To evaluate posturographic validity, thirty healthy participants were tested in four different measurement conditions (M1-M4: standing with/without a balance pad, eyes open/closed) while simultaneously measuring with both devices placed on top of each other. Clinical validity is obtained by correlating stroke patients' Tymo<sup>®</sup> outcome variables (path length and ellipse) of M1-M4 with Berg Balance Scale (BBS) results. Reliability is determined by correlating repeated measurements. The Center of pressure (COP) paths of both force plates show a very strong correlation. The repeated measurement reliability of both force plates is comparable. Tymo<sup>®</sup> outcome variables exhibit moderate to strong correlation with the BBS and demonstrated repeated measurement reliability analogous to healthy participants. Therefore, the Tymo<sup>®</sup> device demonstrates measurement accuracy comparable to a gold-standard device while offering the advantages of portability and user-friendly software. Tymo<sup>®</sup> is suitable for assessing balance in stroke patients, though protocol adaptations and averaging repeated measurements are recommended to enhance feasibility and reliability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s25051309
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validity and Reliability of the Posturographic Outcomes of a Portable Balance Board

Lukas Mayer‐Suess, Maité Calisti, Peter Federolf, Daniel Debertin et al.
2 citations
Sensors
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
9.52
article

Validity and Reliability of the Posturographic Outcomes of a Portable Balance Board

Lukas Mayer‐Suess, Maité Calisti, Peter Federolf, Daniel Debertin, Michael Knoflach, Inge Werner, Patricia Meier
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In view of the frequent use of the portable balance board (Tymo<sup>®</sup>, Tyromotion, Graz, Austria) in neurorehabilitation, the objective of this study is to assess its posturographic validity and reliability in comparison to a floor-embedded force platform (AMTI, Watertown, MA, USA), as well as its clinical validity in stroke patients. To evaluate posturographic validity, thirty healthy participants were tested in four different measurement conditions (M1-M4: standing with/without a balance pad, eyes open/closed) while simultaneously measuring with both devices placed on top of each other. Clinical validity is obtained by correlating stroke patients' Tymo<sup>®</sup> outcome variables (path length and ellipse) of M1-M4 with Berg Balance Scale (BBS) results. Reliability is determined by correlating repeated measurements. The Center of pressure (COP) paths of both force plates show a very strong correlation. The repeated measurement reliability of both force plates is comparable. Tymo<sup>®</sup> outcome variables exhibit moderate to strong correlation with the BBS and demonstrated repeated measurement reliability analogous to healthy participants. Therefore, the Tymo<sup>®</sup> device demonstrates measurement accuracy comparable to a gold-standard device while offering the advantages of portability and user-friendly software. Tymo<sup>®</sup> is suitable for assessing balance in stroke patients, though protocol adaptations and averaging repeated measurements are recommended to enhance feasibility and reliability.

SensorsVol. 25(5)
Innsbruck Medical University (AT), Universität Innsbruck (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
9.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.