The Importance of Existing Social Protection Programs for Mental Health in Pandemic Times

Abstract Using panel data from the Philippines around the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, this paper compares depression rates among beneficiaries of an existing social protection program (a conditional cash transfer program known as the 4Ps) to non-beneficiaries of similar socioeconomic status. Depression rates were low and almost identical for the two groups in late 2019. They increased dramatically for both groups but were significantly lower for 4Ps beneficiaries by July 2020, after the initiation of strict quarantine measures and the distribution of large emergency cash transfers to both groups. The findings suggest that the 4Ps program mattered more for mental health during the crisis, for two possible reasons. First, regular cash support might become more valuable in times of economic hardship and uncertainty. Second, the existing program infrastructure can improve the effectiveness of a government’s crisis response—in this case, by allowing for more timely distribution of emergency cash to those already part of the social protection system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The World Bank Economic Review
Published
2025-02-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhaf003
Primary Topic
Employment and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Importance of Existing Social Protection Programs for Mental Health in Pandemic Times

Yoonyoung Cho, Teresa Molina
The World Bank Economic Review
Employment and Welfare Studies
article

The Importance of Existing Social Protection Programs for Mental Health in Pandemic Times

Yoonyoung Cho, Teresa Molina
article en

Abstract

Abstract Using panel data from the Philippines around the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, this paper compares depression rates among beneficiaries of an existing social protection program (a conditional cash transfer program known as the 4Ps) to non-beneficiaries of similar socioeconomic status. Depression rates were low and almost identical for the two groups in late 2019. They increased dramatically for both groups but were significantly lower for 4Ps beneficiaries by July 2020, after the initiation of strict quarantine measures and the distribution of large emergency cash transfers to both groups. The findings suggest that the 4Ps program mattered more for mental health during the crisis, for two possible reasons. First, regular cash support might become more valuable in times of economic hardship and uncertainty. Second, the existing program infrastructure can improve the effectiveness of a government’s crisis response—in this case, by allowing for more timely distribution of emergency cash to those already part of the social protection system.

The World Bank Economic ReviewVol. 40(1)
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US), World Bank (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Employment and Welfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.